Integrating V = V(initial) + at

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alem2000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrating
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the equation V = V(initial) + at to derive the position equation x = x(initial) + v(initial)t + (1/2)at². Participants explore the steps involved in the integration process, particularly focusing on the treatment of the acceleration term.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in integrating the term (at) and questions the use of the uv-integral theorem.
  • Another participant suggests that the integration from v = v_0 + at to x = x_0 + v_0 t + (1/2) a t² is straightforward, noting that v = dx/dt.
  • A participant seeks clarification on whether the integration is performed from the initial time to time t.
  • Another participant confirms that both terms, v_0 and at, are integrated from the initial time (t = 0) to t, and explains that x_0 serves as the integration constant representing the initial position.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion includes some agreement on the integration process, but there are differing levels of understanding regarding the steps involved, particularly with the treatment of the acceleration term.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the specific integration steps or addressed potential assumptions regarding the integration limits and constants.

Alem2000
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
sorry i didnt use latex..I tried...its annoying


V=V(initial) + at...when you integrate both sides you get x=x(initial) + ..?
I had a little trouble trying to integrate the (at) do you use the uv-integral(v DV) theorem...well i used that and it and it didnt give me the second equation for constant a...near to it but off by two terms. Would anyone be kind enough to show me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Somethings messed up with your formatting. Is your question how to get from this:
[tex]v = v_0 + at[/tex]
to this:
[tex]x = x_0 + v_0 t + 1/2 a t^2[/tex]
If so, it's straightforward integration, since v = dx/dt.
 
I understand the first two terms must give you x and x initial. But I can't seem to grasp where the rest..are you integrating from time initial to time t?
 
Yes, you are integrating both terms, [itex]v_0[/itex] and [itex]a t[/itex], from the initial time (t = 0) to t. [itex]x_0[/itex] is just the integration constant = initial position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K