In binary can we have a value with "deci" "centi" "mili" or more lower valued prefix?

[sadaf2605]

i have learnt that,
1 Kilo Byte = 210 byte
1 Miga byte = 220 byte
. . . .
1 Yotta byte = 224 byte


Now my question is, can we have a DECI, CENTI, MILI bytes? i assume the answer could be negative, but why? can anyone explain this thingto me? please! i WILL be greatful to you!

[JaredJames]

i have learnt that,
1 Kilo Byte = 210 byte
1 Miga byte = 220 byte
. . . .
1 Yotta byte = 224 byte

1 Yotta byte = 280 byte

Bits aside, Bytes are the smallest value possible as far as I'm aware. You can't have a milli/deci/centibyte as they are all less than 1 byte.

[sadaf2605]

1 Yotta byte = 280 byte

Bits aside, Bytes are the smallest value possible as far as I'm aware. You can't have a milli/deci/centibyte as they are all less than 1 byte.

ow, thanks, i was thinking more complicated way :P thaks alot alot lots!

[Mark44]

A byte is the smallest unit of addressable computer storage, but there is terminology for parts of a byte. The modern byte is made up of eight bits, but older computer architectures worked with bytes made up of six bits. Half a byte is a nibble (sometimes spelled nybble or less often nyble), or four bits.

Since it is meaningless to think about fractional parts of a bit, which can be either 0 or 1, the decimal fraction prefixes deci-, centi-, etc. aren't used.

[Borek]

I don't see a problem with millibytes, it is just a matter of application. If I am sending one SMS (180 characters) per hour, transmission speed is on average 50 millibytes per second.

[sadaf2605]

The modern byte is made up of eight bits, but older computer architectures worked with bytes made up of six bits.

Why they had to add three more bits to six? What kinds of problem we could have possibly faced if six bits made up bytes were still working?

[JaredJames]

Why they had to add three more bits to six? What kinds of problem we could have possibly faced if six bits made up bytes were still working?

They added two more bits, not three.

The fact it still works is irrelevant. My old computer with a 20gb hd and 256kb ram still work, but there's a reason I'm sitting here on my shiny new HP.

[Mark44]

Why they had to add three more bits to six? What kinds of problem we could have possibly faced if six bits made up bytes were still working?they added two more bits to get eight, not three. The reason for six-bit bytes on some old computers (such as Digital Equipment Corporation's PDP-5, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programmed_Data_Processor) was that the CPU registers held twelve bits, which is two six-bit bytes.

Later PDP versions such as the PDP-11 had 16-bit and 32-bit processors, with 8-bit bytes. Other PDP versions had processors that could handle 18 bits or 36 bits. Most personal computers these days have either 32-bit processors or 64-bit processors.

Raising the bit number in a processor enables the processor to work with larger numbers, and can speed things up by performing an operation in one cycle instead of two or more.

[madisonstan]

I think the reason for 8 bits in a byte is primarily because it let people use one byte to represent one English character, when people started wanting to handle text on computers. Also, a 3 digit octal expression can be used to represent the value of an 8 bit byte, which may have had some influence. But six bits was not enough to represent the necessary letters, numbers, and punctuation, and still have characters terminate on word-boundaries in memory. (Not terminating on a word boundary would make data retrieval from disk inefficient, or result in wasted part-words.) The PDP-10 actually used 7 bit bytes, so in a 36 bit word there were 5 characters and a left-over bit. That bit was used to check parity on dectapes. If the parity was wrong, the tape reader knew that the tape was damaged. Actually, one character per byte is just about obsolete, because modern computers need to be able to handle lots of foreign characters, so now multiple bytes are often used to represent a single letter. But 8-bits has become synonymous with a "byte", and I don't see that changing in the near future.

[I like Serena]

i have learnt that,
1 Kilo Byte = 210 byte
1 Miga byte = 220 byte
. . . .
1 Yotta byte = 224 byte


Now my question is, can we have a DECI, CENTI, MILI bytes? i assume the answer could be negative, but why? can anyone explain this thingto me? please! i WILL be greatful to you!

This is not quite right. The proper terms (IEC prefixes) are:
1 KiB = 1 kibibyte = 210 bytes = 1024 bytes
1 MiB = 1 mibibyte = 220 bytes = 1048576 bytes
. . . .
1 YiB = 1 yobibyte = 280 bytes

Furthermore we have the SI prefixes:
1 kB = 1 kilobyte = 1000 bytes
1 MB = 1 megabyte = 106 bytes
. . . .
1 YB = 1 yottabyte = 1024 bytes

The SI prefixes also work for amounts smaller than a byte
1 mB = 1 millibyte = 0.001 byte

I guess you could also use smaller IEC prefixes, although there would be a problem with their names.
We could for instance define 1 miB for 1/1024 bytes, but its logical name would be mibibyte, but this one is already taken for 1 MiB.