View Full Version : damping coefficient
A 50.0-g hard-boiled egg moves on the end of a spring with force constant . It is released with an amplitude 0.300 m. A damping force acts on the egg. After it oscillates for 5.00 s, the amplitude of the motion has decreased to 0.100 m.Calculate the magnitude of the damping coefficient . Express the magnitude of the damping coefficient numerically in kilograms per second, to three significant figures
pls who can help me?
thanx
How should Newton's 2.law of motion look like?
That's correct!
Now, what type of solutions have you learnt that this differential equation has?
See it as
-kx - b \frac{dx}{dt} = m\frac{d^2 x}{dt^2}
You're right, thanks alridno :smile:
but what is the answer of d^2/dt^2 then?
mlee:
Any progress at what sort of solutions your equation has?
Now, I'd like you try a solution of the form:
x(t)=Ae^{rt} (A and r constants)
What condition must be placed on "r" in order for this to be a solution.
Please post your work.
Asin(wt)+Bcos (wt)
This is a solution of an UNDAMPED, harmonic oscillator.
Your oscillator is NOT undamped; try my approach, and post your work.
You lack a minus sign in your exponential!
Now, knowing
a) The initial displacement
and
b)That the initial velocity is zero
How can you determine A,\phi
Besides, what is your value of "w"?
ω = sqrt(k/m)
ω' = √((k/m) - (bē/4mē))
Now, so how does your initial conditions determine A,\phi?
and w' = 5*10^2-(b^2/1*10^-2)
is that right?
Now, initially we have:
A\cos\phi=A_{0}
where A_{0} is the initial displacement.
In order to find the position, we differentiate:
\frac{dx}{dt}=Ae^{-\frac{bt}{2m}}(-w'\sin(w't+\phi)-\frac{b}{2m}\cos(w't+\phi))
Hence, for t=0, we must have:
0=A(-w'\sin(\phi)-\frac{b}{2m}\cos(\phi))
Furthermore, in order to solve the problem, remember that:
Ae^{\frac{-bt}{2m}} is the AMPLITUDE as a function of time..
cos phi is 0.333?
is that right?
You get the equations:
A\cos\phi=A_{0}
and
tan\phi=-\frac{b}{2mw'}
You're right!
While I have a method to determine 'b', I don't think this is what has been intended.
I think that it has been assumed (incorrectly!) that the amplitude function is:
A_{0}e^{\frac{-bt}{2m}}
where A_{0},m are known quantities.
Hence, it is simple to determine 'b' from this.
(Just plug in the proper t-value and set your amplitude equal to the given value)
I think this has been the intention; the equation you may derive for 'b' is not easy to solve.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.