PDA

View Full Version : Apatite


chawki
Feb15-11, 02:50 PM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Apatite (Ca5(PO4)3F) is used to manufacture fertilizer.

2. Relevant equations
How many kilograms of pure phosphorus (P) is included in 1150 kg of apatite?



3. The attempt at a solution
How we solve this, tell me only first step...
we can't even use the composition percentage law :grumpy:

chemisttree
Feb15-11, 03:06 PM
Start with the forumla weight of apatite. Convert to moles.

Can you take it from there?

chawki
Feb15-11, 04:31 PM
can you please tell me how to find the formula weight?
i have learnt chemistry ages ago..and it was in french..

maybe you meant the molar mass ? if it's that, then it is 504.31g/mol
504.31 = 1150000/n
n= 1150000/504.31
n= 2280.34mol

chemisttree
Feb15-11, 04:52 PM
Right, that's how many moles of apatite. How many moles of phosphorous per mole of apatite?

chawki
Feb15-11, 04:53 PM
That's where i'm stuck

chemisttree
Feb15-11, 04:56 PM
Just look at the empirical formula. You do this part by inspection... nothing to calculate.

chawki
Feb15-11, 05:01 PM
1mole

chemisttree
Feb15-11, 05:04 PM
So if you were given 1 mole of Ca5(PO4)3F, you would get only one mole of P out of it?

chawki
Feb15-11, 05:06 PM
i'm not sure, i'm confused

chawki
Feb15-11, 05:09 PM
mp/30.97 = 1150000/504.31
mp= 7062.22g

chemisttree
Feb15-11, 05:40 PM
AxBy gives you x moles of A and y moles of B per mole of AxBy.

How about the moles of P in one mole of Ca5(PO4)3F?

chawki
Feb15-11, 05:57 PM
Three

chawki
Feb15-11, 06:31 PM
So if you were given 1 mole of Ca5(PO4)3F, you would get only one mole of P out of it?

Not necessarly i think

chawki
Feb18-11, 05:22 PM
mp/30.97 = 1150000/504.31
mp= 7062.22g

70622.23

chawki
Feb24-11, 02:50 PM
Please tell me if i'm right

Borek
Feb24-11, 03:29 PM
No. You have still ignored fact that there are three moles of P per apatite molecule.

chawki
Feb24-11, 04:54 PM
mp/3*30.97 = 1150000/504.31
mp= 211866.709g
mp=211.866Kg

chawki
Feb26-11, 09:27 PM
Please reply to my posts!

Borek
Feb27-11, 03:10 AM
We are not your private tutorial service, aren't we?

Watch significant figures.

chawki
Feb27-11, 04:16 AM
No, You are not. and i want to say that i appreciate having time for posting and replying.
God bless you all.