View Full Version : I thought I understood...
doxigywlz
Oct18-04, 07:09 PM
Basically, I understand this question but I keep coming up with the wrong answer!! Please show me where I am going wrong!
A 12.0-g bullet is fired horizontally into a 100-g wooden block that is initially at rest on a frictionless horizontal surface and connected to a spring having spring constant 150 N/m. The bullet becomes embedded in the block. If the bullet-block system compresses the spring by a maximum of 80.0cm, what was the speed of the bullet at impact with the block?
Book answer: 273 m/s
My work:
Conservation of Mechanical Energy
(KE + PEg + PEs)i = (KE + PEg + PEs)f
1/2(12)(Vi^2) = 1/2(112)(Vf^2) + 1/2(150)(80^2)
soo..... 6(Vi^2) = 56(Vf^2) + 480,000
and from Conservation of Momentum:
12V1i =112V2f
0= 56Vf^2 - 6 Vi^2 + 480,000
plugging in for Vi.. I get 87 x 6 (I think I'm wrong here..)
so 46Vf2 = 480,000
Vf = 32.0 m/s
12Vi = 112(32)
Vi = 299 m/s
Please, please, please help me! I'm going to go crazy!
During the collision of bullet with block, energy is NOT conserved. But momentum is. After the collision, the combined "bullet + block" will have a final speed, and thus a kinetic energy. Energy is conserved during the compression of the spring.
doxigywlz
Oct18-04, 08:13 PM
are you telling me that the first part of the kinetic energy is equal to zero? sorry,i'm a little confused....
are you telling me that the first part of the kinetic energy is equal to zero? sorry,i'm a little confused....
I don't know what you mean. Treat this problem as having two related parts:
(1) the collision: use conservation of momentum
(2) the spring compression: use conservation of energy
doxigywlz
Oct18-04, 08:31 PM
i hate to be a bother... but isn't that what i did?
i hate to be a bother... but isn't that what i did?
No. You tried to apply conservation of energy during the collision--that won't work.
My work:
Conservation of Mechanical Energy
(KE + PEg + PEs)i = (KE + PEg + PEs)f
1/2(12)(Vi^2) = 1/2(112)(Vf^2) + 1/2(150)(80^2)
For the collision, only use conservation of momentum to relate Vi to Vf.
doxigywlz
Oct18-04, 08:43 PM
okay, i think i see what you mean. so... will it be m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2) vf ??
okay, i think i see what you mean. so... will it be m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1 + m2) vf ??
Right. (v2 = 0)
doxigywlz
Oct18-04, 08:51 PM
okay, so then i have
V1i = (112/12) Vf
and then
(12)(V1i)^2 = 12 V1f^2 + 100 V2f^2 + (150)(80)^2??
okay, so then i have
V1i = (112/12) Vf
Right.
and then
(12)(V1i)^2 = 12 V1f^2 + 100 V2f^2 + (150)(80)^2??
I have no idea what you are doing here. Instead, apply conservation of energy to the system after the collision. Hint: After the collision, the only speed involved is Vf.
doxigywlz
Oct18-04, 09:18 PM
i'm really confused.... i don't get it. i tried what you said but i'm still not getting the right answer.
doxigywlz
Oct18-04, 09:42 PM
ooookkkkaaayyy.... doesn't look like i'm getting gonna get anywhere with this problem 2nite.
Pyrrhus
Oct18-04, 10:51 PM
I thought you understood the problem??
Well ok I'll try to explain..
Imagine a Bullet..... It collides with a wooden block and stays inside the block, What type of collision this is Doxi??? Of course perfectly inelastic (Well an ideal case), so energy is NOT conserved (look up elastic collision), but Momentum is conserved.
So let's start with our first equation.
m_{bullet}v_{bullet} + m_{box}v_{box} = (m_{bullet} + m_{box})v_{both}
we know the box initially is at rest so.
m_{bullet}v_{bullet} = (m_{bullet} + m_{box})v_{both}
But we have 2 unknowns!!!! :cry:
But WAIT!!!!!!!! Mechanical Energy is conserved for our bullet+box system!!!!
:bugeye: :biggrin:
Conservation of Mechanical Energy [Conservative System]
\Delta K + \Delta \Omega = 0
K + \Omega = K_{o} + \Omega_{o}
so, we analyse two points we can use, we can use the point when the box+bullet system get in contact with the spring (spring at equilibrium) and the point where the spring is at its max extend and there's no speed for our system.
\frac{1}{2}(m_{bullet} + m_{box})v_{both}^2 = \frac{1}{2}kx_{max}^2
Note: i was trying to be funny, because sometimes thinking "funny" works
:rolleyes:
doxigywlz
Oct19-04, 10:57 PM
thanks, by the way... that helped a lot
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.