Yet another spaceship moving at .9c thread

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pervect
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spaceship Thread
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of a spaceship moving at 0.9c impacting a planet, specifically focusing on the energy involved and the physical effects of such a collision. Participants explore calculations related to kinetic energy, momentum, and the implications of relativistic speeds in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose modeling the Earth and the spaceship as two particles and calculating the energy and momentum transferred in a totally-inelastic collision.
  • There is a discussion about the relativistic factor at 0.9c, with some participants noting that it is approximately 2.29, leading to considerations of the effective mass during the collision.
  • One participant calculates the kinetic energy of the spaceship using the formula (\gamma-1)mc^2, estimating it to be around 10^25 J, which is suggested to be comparable to the rest mass energy of the ship.
  • Another participant compares the kinetic energy of the spaceship at 0.9c to that of a typical meteor, stating it has significantly more energy than all the world's nuclear weapons combined.
  • There are calculations regarding the impact energy and its potential effects, with one participant referencing an impact calculator and estimating a catastrophic air-burst scenario.
  • Discrepancies arise regarding the calculations of energy, with some participants questioning the accuracy of the impact calculator and suggesting it may not account for relativistic effects correctly.
  • One participant discusses the gravitational binding energy of the Earth and its atmosphere, comparing it to the kinetic energy calculated for the spaceship's impact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the calculations and implications of the spaceship's impact, with no consensus reached on the accuracy of the energy estimates or the effects of such an impact. Disagreements exist regarding the use of relativistic laws in the impact calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations depend on assumptions about the relativistic effects and the accuracy of the impact calculator used. There are unresolved discrepancies in energy estimates and the implications of gravitational binding energy in relation to the impact energy.

pervect
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
10,484
Reaction score
1,636
Yet another "spaceship moving at .9c" thread

What I'd like to see a thread about is what would happen if a spaceship, moving at .9c, were to impact a planet. Let's say the spaceship was 100,000 metric tons, roughly the size of a Nimitz-class aircraft carrier.

It's not hard to figure out the energy of the spaceship, but it's harder to estimate the physical effects.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As a first approach, model the Earth and the ship as two particles.
Assuming a totally-inelastic collision, calculate the energy and momentum transferred.

Some facts via Google
"mass of Earth = 5.9742 × 10^24 kilograms"
and
"1 metric ton = 1 000 kilograms"
and
"1 / sqrt(1 - (.9^2)) = 2.29415734".
 
I assume you mean the REST MASS of the spaceship.. As robphy pointed out, the "relativistic factor" at .9 c is only 2.29 so you are now talking "what if 2 and a quarter ships crashed into a planet. Doubt if it would do a whole lot!
 
2.29 ships at .9C is still a lot of kinetic energy though...
 
Wow. I'd like to know the answer to that question too. The kinetic energy of the ship is

[tex](\gamma-1)mc^2[/tex]

where m is the rest mass, and since gamma is roughly 2 in this case, the kinetic energy is close to the rest mass energy of the ship.

Since m=10^8 kg and c is roughly 3*10^8 m/s, this means that the kinetic energy is about 10^25 J.

That's a lot of Joules. :smile:
 
Last edited:
2.29 ships at .9C is still a lot of kinetic energy though...

If a typical meteor hits the atmosphere at 30,000mph, an object of the same mass going .9c has 400 million times the kinetic energy. Thats considerably more energy than all the worlds' nuclear weapons put together. Anyone have a link to that impact calculator website (lemme see if I can find it...)?
 
HERE it is. I'm not sure if I'm doing this right, but it gives me a 10^9 megaton air-burst with a shock wave that at 1000 miles is 27 psi and flattens pretty much everything in its path.
 
10^25 Joules is of order 10^9 megatons (according to onlineconversion.com), so it seems to be correct so far.
 
Just to clarify, I mean the invariant mass of the ship, i.e. the rest mass, is 100,000 metric tons (this is about the same as the displacement mass of the Nimitz class carriers).

When I run the figures through the URL for the impact calculator, I use

(62 meter radius sphere of 100 kg/m^3 density -> 124 meter diameter, 100 kg/m^3 density)

and I get

Energy before atmospheric entry: NaN x 10NaN Joules = 8.68 x 10^8 MegaTons TNT

(which is .8 petatons, peta=10^15)

But I don't think that's right. I get 2*10^25 joules for the total energy of the ship. 2e25 joules is 4.7 petatons of TNT according to

online conversion

not .8 petatons.
 
  • #10
Dunno but its likely the impact equation is not using the correct relativistic laws, since its highly unnusual in practise anyway.

Either way, the point is that its a monumental explosion, that pretty much levels the Earth's surface and all life pretty damn fast. (Kinda puts some perspective on the alien crash claims) assuming say the size of an aircraft carrier.
 
  • #11
yeah relativistic velocities would not occur for something actually striking the earth.

Unless we really pissed off an alien race who then loaded a nimitz class carrier into a giant rail gun at shot it at us at .9c. So long as Bush is not president at first contact we should be ok...
 
  • #12
I rather laboriously computed the gravitational binding energy of a sphere of constant density of radius R, only to find the result with a websearch

here

It turns out that the gravitational binding energy of the Earth is 2.24*10^32 joules. The impact calculated earlier in the thread has 2*10^25 joules of KE, so it has about one ten-millionth of the binding energy of the Earth.

The binding energy of the Earth's atmosphere is 3*10^26 joules (by my calculation, -G Mearth Matmos / Rearth, with Matmos = 5*10^21 kg.) So the impact has about 1/15 of the gravitational binding energy of the atmosphere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
14K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
8K