Bjarne
- 344
- 0
How is the kinetic energy of a rotation planet (e.g; the earth) calculated?
The discussion revolves around the effects of gravitational anomalies on a planet's rotation, exploring concepts related to kinetic energy, angular momentum, and the implications of mass distribution changes on rotational dynamics. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications regarding planetary motion and gravitational influences.
Participants express various viewpoints on the relationship between gravitational anomalies and rotation, with no consensus reached on the implications or mechanisms involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effects of these anomalies on planetary motion.
Limitations include assumptions about the constancy of angular momentum and the specific conditions under which gravitational anomalies might influence rotation. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of how these factors interact.
Bjarne said:How is the kinetic energy of a rotation planet (e.g; the earth) calculated?
What I had in mind, what about if a planet or a star had a heavy gravitational anomaly at the surface, a tidal wave, a mountain a crust density anomaly etc.. This would make the planet heavier in the one "end" as in the other "end" .tiny-tim said:the angular momentum of a planet about its star (or a moon about its planet) is constant …
this is because the rotational version of Newton's second law says …
torque = rate of change of angular momentum
and since the torque (moment) of the gravitational force is obviously zero (about the star), the angular momentum cannot change![]()
Bjarne said:What I had in mind, what about if a planet or a star had a heavy gravitational anomaly at the surface, a tidal wave, a mountain a crust density anomaly etc.. This would make the planet heavier in the one "end" as in the other "end" .
Would that not cause larger angular momentum in the "heavy end" of the planet, and cause a planet to rotate.