What Type of Finite or Infinite Universe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of the universe, specifically whether it is finite or infinite, and the implications of these concepts. Participants explore various mathematical and philosophical ideas related to infinity, including the potential for different types of infinities and the structure of the universe as understood through modern physics and quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference the concept of an "exhaustively random infinity," suggesting that if the universe is infinite, it may not be exhaustively random, as indicated by the nature of quarks.
  • Others argue that the universe follows established physical laws, such as general relativity and quantum mechanics, and emphasize the need for compelling evidence before rejecting these models.
  • A participant introduces Cantor's ideas, questioning the implications of a finite universe and the concept of time, suggesting that even a countable universe raises further questions about what precedes it.
  • Another participant discusses the concept of degrees of infinitude, mentioning the infinite divisibility of numbers and the Mandelbrot set, while noting potential limits at the Planck scale.
  • One viewpoint posits that we may exist in a "transinfinite" universe, with infinite types of universes and branching quantum states, suggesting that any plausible finite form may exist within this hierarchy.
  • A different perspective emphasizes the idea of a "Musical Universe," proposing that infinity entails continuous change and questioning the existence of particles smaller than quarks, suggesting that our understanding of infinity may evolve as we learn more.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of the universe, with no consensus reached. Multiple competing ideas about the structure and implications of infinity are present, alongside differing interpretations of physical laws.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve assumptions about the nature of infinity and the universe that remain unresolved. The implications of mathematical concepts like Cantor's ideas and the limits of divisibility are also not fully explored.

CeeAnne
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Following is an entry from Q is for Quantum by John Gribbin.

infinity There is more (sometimes less) to infinity for a mathematician than to the person in the street. Science-fiction fans and amateur philosophers may be familiar with the idea that, if the Universe is infinite, then not only must anything that is possible happen somewhere in the Universe, but anything that is possible will happen an infinite number of times, in an infinite number of places. In that case, all the weirdness of the quantum world could be explained as just one huge statistical interference fluke affecting our corner of an infinite Universe. But the catch (apart from the mind-boggling nature of such a statistical fluke) is that this requires a special kind of infinity, called an exhaustively random infinity. It is quite possible to have an infinity that does not include everything - a trivial example is the set of all the even numbers. It is certainly infinite, but it is not exhaustive (or random) because it does not contain any of the odd numbers. Nobody knows whether or not the Universe is infinite, let alone whether or not it is an exhaustively random infinity. -Q is for Quantum-

Are there other plausible infinities and finitudes for the universe? As example, what we've learned about quarks suggest the universe, finite or infinite, is not exhaustively random but a special set. -CeeAnne-
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The universe, according to modern physics, is not randomly ordered. It appears to obey many rules that have been confirmed with great accuracy [re: GR and QM]. It makes sense to demand compelling evidence before abandoning those models.
 
I've not heard of the idea of an exhaustively random infinity, but I have wondered about applying Cantor's ideas to the universe. Some people don't like the idea of a universe with a finite age, as you can always ask 'what came before'. However, even if you take the universe to be a countable number ([tex]\omega[/tex]) of days old, you can always ask, "what happened [tex]\omega +1[/tex] days ago?"
 
There are degrees of infinitude. For instance, between the integers 0 and 1, there are an infinite number of intermediate values. You can continue to divide that space finer and finer forever. The Mandelbrot set (nice self-similar fractals that make gorgeous pictures) is at the intersection of real and imaginary numbers, and again, depending how long you can wait for your computer to grind out the results, you can delve deeper and deeper into that set forever. As physicists, we expect to see some limits on infinite divisibility of time and space at the Planck scale, if not larger scales. Mathemeticians work in fields where such limits aren't always expected.
 
as Sir martin Rees often points out- we probably live in a universe that is transinfinite with infinities within infinities within infinities- there are infinite types of universes with the infinite/eternal multiverse- an infinite number of these universe are spatially infinite- and each type of universe has an infinite population- and each individual universe is essentially a bundle of infinite branching parallel quantum states-


given this infinite hierarchy of infinities within infinites it is almost unavoidable that any plausible finite form exists transinfinitely-
 
Last edited:
Infinity

John Worrell Keely Our World is a Musical Universe, almost everything we do involves waves. (Satelite,computers,cable,doppler,light,) frequencies that over time we discover and harness to produce smaller or larger waves.


To me Infinity means there is no beginning and no end only change. Everything has a rate of decay and atomic numbers on the elemental tree cubed will give you the frequency of that brief part of infinity. Just because you can see something doesn't mean it exists or doesn't exist, it only means that even we as humans can only comprehend a brief amount of universal information within our senses. Are there particles smaller than quarks or muons ? Yes infinitely. One day we will break a quark into even smaller particles etc. Who knows maybe the more we learn the less infinite everything becomes. Its one step closer to what is already there.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
79
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K