Fairly simple (I assume) acceleration derivation I've blanked on

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for gravitational acceleration, g, using the formula g=2(L2t1-L1t2)/t1t2(t1+t2). The variables L1 and L2 represent distances between infrared sensors on a drop tower, while t1 and t2 denote the time intervals for a dropped ball to pass between these sensors. Participants suggest utilizing kinematic equations, specifically L=vt+(at²)/2 and v_f² = v_0² - 2gd, to simplify the problem and eliminate unnecessary variables. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying these equations to achieve accurate results in the lab report.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations in physics
  • Familiarity with concepts of acceleration and gravitational force
  • Knowledge of experimental physics and lab report writing
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinematic equations in detail
  • Learn how to apply the principle of conservation of energy in motion problems
  • Explore the relationship between distance, time, and velocity in physics experiments
  • Investigate the use of sensors in measuring motion and acceleration
USEFUL FOR

Students in introductory physics courses, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone conducting experiments related to gravitational acceleration.

Jonnoley
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I understand this is probably not at all complicated, but I've completely blanked and I've been working at it for hours now.

Homework Statement



Derive the expression g=2(L2t1-L1t2)/t1t2(t1+t2)

I've replaced the lower case ls there with upper case one's for clarity, but it's just two distances, L1 and L2

This relates to a simple experiment to measure g I'm currently doing a lab report for, where L1 and L2 are the distances between some infrared sensors on the drop tower, and t1 t2 are the times for the ball I dropped to pass between the sensors.

Homework Equations



I have no idea, I've tried every equation of motion and every mathematical operation I could.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried substituting Δt, ΔL and Δv into L=vt+(at2)/2 and have got some fairly close answers, but have also proved acceleration doesn't exist several times, so that might be barking up the wrong tree, in the wrong forest, on the wrong planet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This should be in the lower level physics forum, but no matter. Another relevant equation that you might want to try using is [tex]v_f^2 = v_0^2 - 2 g d.[/tex] That should help you eliminate some of the velocities (that you don't ultimately care about) from the other kinematics equation you listed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
45K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
5K