Solving Systems of 2nd Order DE's with Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spectre5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order System
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a system of second-order differential equations involving two variables, x and y, represented by the equations x'' = 4x - 5y and y'' = 2x - 3. The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to approach this problem, particularly in using eigenvalues and eigenvectors, as they have only encountered first-order systems in class.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss converting the second-order system into a first-order system, with one suggesting a method involving a basis set of functions. Others question the necessity of using eigenvalues and eigenvectors and explore the implications of the original equations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered different approaches, including the use of trial solutions and matrix representations. The original poster acknowledges their comfort with first-order systems but remains uncertain about applying similar concepts to the second-order case. There is no explicit consensus on the best method, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes a lack of prior exposure to similar problems in class and expresses concern about an upcoming exam, indicating time constraints and uncertainty about the exam content.

Spectre5
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
I have this DE and I do not know how to solve it. This is a problem in my review questions that my professor handed out, but we have never done a problem like this in class, so I do not know where to start.

here is the problem:
x'' = 4x - 5y
y'' = 2x - 3

I need to solve it using eigenvalues and eigenvectors. I know how to do this for a system of first order DE's, that is easy. But I don't know what to do for a system of second order DE's.

The one method I did come up with for solving it was to convert it to a system of 4 first order DE's...but then the characteristic equation is a fourth degree polynomial. I know there has got to be a better way, but I just don't know it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about using a basis set that is the product of functions like

[tex]e^{ik_x x}[/tex]

and

[tex]e^{i k_y y[/tex]

?
 
I need to use eigenvalues/eigenvectors though. To be honest, I am not sure how to appraoch it with your suggestion...remember, I have never looked at equations like this, and my teacher is not very helpful either
 
Are you comfortable with solutions of first order systems using eigenvectors?
 
If you let u= x' and v= y' then you have a system of 4 first order equations:

x'= u
y'= v
u'= 4x- 5y
v'= 2x- 3

Yes, the characteristic equation is 4th degree but it is trivial.
Did you mean y"= 2x- 3y?
 
Spectre5 said:
I need to use eigenvalues/eigenvectors though. To be honest, I am not sure how to appraoch it with your suggestion...remember, I have never looked at equations like this, and my teacher is not very helpful either

From the loooks of it,Tide's idea contains eigenvalues +eigenvectors.Those 2 functions are two different vectors in the linear space of solutions of a linear differential eq with constant coeficients.
They for a base in that space,so u need to find the coeficients of the expansion of the general solution in terms of eigenvectors and the eigenvalues "kx" and "ky".

Good luck!

As Hallsofivy pointed out,u may be missing a term.
 
yes, there should be a y on that 3
James R said:
Are you comfortable with solutions of first order systems using eigenvectors?
Yes. Very comfortable with them,

I did think of doing the way that HallsofIvy pointed out. That is the way I guess I know best. I just thought there was an easy/better way. This way seems to be the way that tide and dextercioby are pointing out. maybe I will work on figuring out that way a little bit.

only a few hours til the exam now though...and I don't know if that kind of question will even be on it. however, I know I will do fine on everything else because the rest of the it is really easy. Thanks for the suggestions.
 
a solution

Spectre5, I hope your exam went well! :smile:
---------------------
---------------------

Here is one way to solve the problem using eigenvectors and eigenvalues.

Write the functions x(t) and y(t) together as a 1x2 column-vector x(t). You then have a vector-DE of the form

x"(t) = Mx(t) + a ,

where M is a 2x2 matrix.

If, as you point out, "there should be a y on that 3", then the constant vector a vanishes in the above, and the vector-DE is homogeneous.

Now, suppose M has two linearly independent eigenvectors u and v with corresponding eigenvalues α and β. So, write

x(t) = f(t)u + g(t)v ,

and compute the numbers c and d such that

a = cu + dv

(of course, for the homogeneous case, c = d = 0).

Then, the functions f(t) and g(t) satisfy the DE's:

f"(t) = αf(t) + c ,

g"(t) = βg(t) + d .

Solving these solves the problem.
 
For the second-order system, you can use a trial solution of the form:

[tex]\vec{x} = e^{kt}\vec{v}[/tex].

Differentiating twice gives:

[tex]\vec{x}'' = k^2 e^{kt}\vec{v}[/tex]

The initial homogeneous d.e. can be written:

[tex]\vec{x}'' = \vec{A}\vec{x}[/tex]

where [tex]\vec{A}[/tex] is a 2x2 coefficient matrix. Substituing the trial solution we get:

[tex]k^2 \vec{v} = \vec{A}\vec{v}[/tex]

or

[tex](\vec{A} - k^2\vec{I})\vec{v} = 0[/tex]

This is an eigenvector equation. To solve it, find the eigenvalues, [tex]\lambda_i[/tex] of the matrix A:

[tex]k = \pm sqrt(\lambda_i)[/tex].

Use the eigenvalues to find the eigenvectors [tex]\vec{v}[\tex]<br /> <br /> For the system of 2 variables, x and y, there will be 4 values of k, which give 4 linearly-independent solutions, two for x and two for y. The positive and negative k values each have the same eigenvector associated with them.<br /> <br /> The general solution of the system is a linear combination of the 4 solutions found.[/tex]
 
  • #10
You can also use the Jordan Canonical form approach to solve systems of DE's
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K