Are there Non-Defense Aerospace Job Opportunities for Aerospace Engineers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aerospace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aerospace Jobs
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around job opportunities for aerospace engineers outside of the defense sector. Participants explore various companies and sectors where aerospace engineering skills may be applicable, as well as considerations for changing majors to mechanical engineering.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the predominance of federal jobs in aerospace and considers switching to mechanical engineering due to limited non-defense opportunities.
  • Another participant mentions Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites as a potential employer in civilian aerospace, suggesting that former X-Prize competitors may also be worth exploring.
  • Some participants note that aerospace and mechanical engineering are closely related, with minimal additional coursework required for a concentration in aerospace engineering.
  • Several companies are suggested as potential employers, including Bombardier, Embraer, Gulfstream, Boeing, Airbus, Rolls Royce, Pratt & Whitney, and General Electric, with emphasis on their roles in commercial and private aviation.
  • There is a discussion about the overlap between aerospace and defense industries, with some participants arguing that many aerospace companies also engage in defense-related projects.
  • One participant highlights that while companies like Boeing and Rolls Royce produce civilian products, their technologies are often dual-use, applicable to both civilian and military contexts.
  • Another participant mentions EADS and its involvement in both civil aviation and defense, noting that many engineers at EADS work on non-defense projects.
  • There is a suggestion that focusing on propulsion systems and turbomachinery within mechanical/aerospace engineering could broaden job opportunities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the availability of non-defense job opportunities for aerospace engineers. While some suggest that there are options available, others emphasize the significant overlap with defense-related work.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of conviction regarding the job market, with some suggesting that a graduate degree may be necessary for certain non-military projects. The discussion reflects differing perspectives on the relationship between aerospace engineering and defense industries.

Aerospace
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am an undergrad Aerospace engineering student, and I am going to start my junior year this Spring. I'm really interested in what I'm studying, but the job market for Aerospace engineers is predominantly federal. Does anyone know of, or can think of, or work for a company that is in need of aerospace engineers but is not defense related? I'm considering but am very if-fy about military jobs.

I really need the boost, guys, because I am considering changing my major to Mechanical. :cry:

Thanks!
Aerospace
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Burt Rutan of Scaled Composites runs a civilian aerospace firm out in the Mojave, and he just recently won the X-Prize.

I am unsure if he is hiring, but it might do you well to take a look into it. In fact, I think most of the former X-Prize competitors are worth looking into: Non-military, innovative in design, and certainly worth a major in aerospace engineering.

Cheerio, and good luck with college!
 
AE and ME is practically the same afaik. I am in the process of changing my major from ChemE to ME(w/ Aerospace concentration) and there are only 3 extra courses you take for AE concentration compared with just Mechanical. I think you would need a graduate degree to work on some interesting non-military projects
 
Try these resources. All offer employment on commercial and/or private aviation.

http://www.bombardier.com (Canada)

http://www.embraer.com (Brazil)

http://www.gulfstream.com/ (Subsidiary of General Dynamics, US)

http://www.boeing.com (Commercial Aircraft Division, US)

http://www.airbus.com/dynamic/media/index.asp (Europe)

http://www.raytheonaircraft.com/home.asp (Wichita, KS - Hawker, Beechcraft)

http://www.cessna.com/ (http://cessnajobs.com/positions.chtml) (Whichita, KS)

See also - www.aviationnow.com[/URL] - but details may require registration or subscription.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How about Rolls Royce, Pratt & Whitney, and General Electric? People forget that the whole aerospace thing is just as much about aircraft engines as the aircraft themselves.

Also, I wouldn't worry about switching to Mech, most jobs (at least in the UK) don't differentiate between the disciplines because they're so similar.
 
brewnog said:
How about Rolls Royce, Pratt & Whitney, and General Electric? People forget that the whole aerospace thing is just as much about aircraft engines as the aircraft themselves.

Also, I wouldn't worry about switching to Mech, most jobs (at least in the UK) don't differentiate between the disciplines because they're so similar.

Nobody knows nothing about E.A.D.S.?
 
Yeah but it's pretty heavily defence orientated isn't it?
 
This depends a little on the strength of your conviction: while there are plenty of jobs in aerospace that have little to do with defense, there are not many companies that do. You could work for Boeing building 777s, but you can be sure that the technology used there will go into the next big bomber.

Rolls Royce builds airliner engines, but the same engines power military aircraft (and ships).
 
brewnog said:
Yeah but it's pretty heavily defence orientated isn't it?


I recommend to visit this site: www.eads.com

E.A.D.S is the european consorce of aeronautics (European Aeronautics and Defence Systems) . They have a major role in Space (Ariane Project, Galileo), Civil Aviation (Airbus), and defence (Eurofighter and Eurocopter). But they don't work only in defence. I am 10 km. near a EADS-CASA (the spanish version of the consorce) factory. They design and built some parts of the Ariane (the adapter), and collaborate with the structural design of the Airbus. Also they product some military large transport aircrafts (C-Series and Hercules), and assemble Eurofighter pieces.

The majority of the engineers working at there, are Aeronautical or Industrial (Mechanical, Electrical or Electronic) engineers.
 
  • #10
Actually Airbus is a division of EADS, and then there is EADS aerospace group: ASTRIUM Satellites, Space Transportation (Ariane and ATV) and Space Services.

http://www.arianespace.com/site/index2.html

Actually, brewnog raised a good point - the jet engine manufacturers are wholly separate from the aircraft manufacturers.

Besides GE, Pratt & Whitney (subsidiary of http://www.utc.com/), and Rolls Royce, there is also http://www.snecma.com/en/group/index.php .

Snecma to supply wheels and brakes for Boeing 7E7 Dreamliner - "Boeing has chosen Messier-Bugatti, a Snecma group subsidiary, to develop the wheels and brakes for its new commercial airplane, the 7E7 Dreamliner. The contract covers the design, manufacture, delivery and support of wheels, brakes and control units."

These companies not sell jet engines to the aircraft manufacturers, but the same turbines are used for many other power applications. So majoring in mechanical/aerospace with emphasis on propulsion systems and turbomachinery would provide for a wide range of opportunity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
Boeing gets 35 new orders for its 787 Dreamliner

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/07/08/business/boeing.php

SEATTLE: Boeing announced 35 new orders for its 787 Dreamliner on the eve of its presentation Sunday of the new commercial jet.

Air Berlin ordered 25 and ALAFCO, the aviation lease and finance company of Kuwait, was taking 10, Boeing said Saturday. Together, the orders are valued at $5.62 billion at list prices, although customers typically negotiate discounts.

The midsize 787, seating between 210 to 330 passengers, will be the world's first commercial jetliner made mostly of carbon-fiber composites, which are lighter and sturdier than aluminum. Boeing has said that this and other technological advances will make the 787 more fuel-efficient and cheaper to maintain.

"It means more frequency, more point-to-point routes and fewer changes at big hub airports," Richard Aboulafia, at Teal Group, an aerospace consulting firm, said. "Anyone who changes planes regularly at Heathrow, Narita or Frankfurt can be grateful."

Boeing now has orders for 677 of the new 787s from 47 customers. The first flight of the new plane is scheduled for later this year, with the first delivery to a customer, All Nippon Airways of Japan, in May 2008.

. . . .
I look forward to flying in one of these aircraft.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
26K