Calculating Angular Velocity of a Pulley under Varying Force

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the angular velocity of a pulley subjected to a time-varying tangential force. The problem involves concepts from rotational dynamics, specifically relating to moment of inertia, angular acceleration, and the integration of forces over time.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between tangential force, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration. There are attempts to apply equations of motion, questioning the assumption of constant angular acceleration and the need for integration to find the final angular velocity. Some participants consider integrating force to find work done and its relation to kinetic energy.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the necessity of integration to determine angular velocity. There are multiple interpretations of how to approach the problem, particularly regarding the integration of angular acceleration and the implications of initial conditions on the final result.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about unit consistency when applying the equations, particularly when multiplying force by radius and dividing by moment of inertia. There is also mention of the initial conditions provided in the problem and their relevance to the calculations being discussed.

Beretta
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A pulley of moment of inertia 0.021kg-m^2 and radius 0.12m is acted upon by a force which varies in time as F= 0.23t + 0.12t^2 where F is in Newton and t is in second. suppose that the pulley is initially rotating at 0.18 r/s and the force acts tangentially to the pulley. Find the magnitude of the angular velocity of the pulley two seconds after the force began to act on the pulley.

I was thinking if I can use F(tan) r = I (alpha)

alpha = (0.12m(0.23t+0.12t^2))/0.21kgm^2 to get the accelration and then plug it in

w = wi + (alpha)t to get the velocity?

Is my reasoning correct?

What if I integrate the Force to get the work W, and then W = Kf - Ki?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Beretta said:
I was thinking if I can use F(tan) r = I (alpha)

alpha = (0.12m(0.23t+0.12t^2))/0.21kgm^2 to get the accelration
Good!
and then plug it in

w = wi + (alpha)t
That equation assumes constant alpha, which is not the case here. You have to integrate to find the final omega.
 
That equation assumes constant alpha, which is not the case here. You have to integrate to find the final omega.


You mean intergrate in the Force to get K = 1/2 Iw^2? I'm a bit lost! What do you mean?
 
Last edited:
Beretta said:
You mean intergrate in the Force to get K = 1/2 Iw^2? I'm a bit lost! What do you mean?
You have [itex]\alpha (t)[/itex]. So realize that [itex]d\omega/dt = \alpha (t)[/itex], so:
[tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]
 
Beretta said:
w = wi + (alpha)t to get the velocity?
Is my reasoning correct?

Nope,as Doc said,u need to integrate this relation

[tex]d\omega=\alpha dt[/tex]

between corresponding limits.

Beretta said:
What if I integrate the Force to get the work W, and then W = Kf - Ki?

Well,you figure it out.Is it possible without finding [itex]\theta (t)[/itex] and reversing it.?? :rolleyes:
[tex]\frac{I}{2}(\omega_{f}^{2}-\omega_{i}^{2})=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{f}} F(t(\theta))r d\theta[/tex]

Daniel.
 
Doc Al said:
You have [itex]\alpha (t)[/itex]. So realize that [itex]d\omega/dt = \alpha (t)[/itex], so:
[tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]

Do I need to go through this?

dextercioby said:
Nope,as Doc said,u need to integrate this relation

[tex]d\omega=\alpha dt[/tex]

between corresponding limits.



Well,you figure it out.Is it possible without finding [itex]\theta (t)[/itex] and reversing it.?? :rolleyes:
[tex]\frac{I}{2}(\omega_{f}^{2}-\omega_{i}^{2})=\int_{\theta_{0}}^{\theta_{f}} F(t(\theta))r d\theta[/tex]

Daniel.


Can't I just use [tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]
But do I need to subtract the initial omega that is given from the final omega?

One more question please: when I did multiply the force equation by the radius, should I do the dot product or just multiply it commutatively. the reason I'm asking is the units when multiplying 0.12m by 0.23t + 0.12t^2 of course its m/t where t is in seconds. but after that I have to divide the answer by the moment of inertia which is kg m^2. Logicaly I know the answer should be in m/s^2 since its accelration and I also know that accelration could be written in N/kg, but here I have m(t)/kg m^2.
 
Last edited:
Beretta said:
Can't I just use [tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]
But do I need to subtract the initial omega that is given from the final omega?
[tex]\omega_f = \omega_i + \Delta \omega[/tex]

Also realize that the units of "0.23t + 0.12t^2" are Newtons (when t is in seconds), and the units of torque are N-m. The units of [itex]\omega[/itex] will be radians/sec.
 
Doc Al said:
[tex]\omega_f = \omega_i + \Delta \omega[/tex]

Also realize that the units of "0.23t + 0.12t^2" are Newtons (when t is in seconds), and the units of torque are N-m. The units of [itex]\omega[/itex] will be radians/sec.

I keep thinking about rotation in terms of motion. Yes, radian/sec not m/s.
I really appreciate all your help guys. Thank you very much.
 
Beretta said:
Do I need to go through this?

Yes,it's the only way to get the answer.


Beretta said:
Can't I just use [tex]\Delta \omega = \int_{0}^{2} \alpha(t) dt[/tex]

U can.Doc gave you the integral formula,i gave u the differential formula.

Beretta said:
]But do I need to
subtract the initial omega that is given from the final omega?

Nope,correct integration will give the result.

Beretta said:
One more question please: when I did multiply the force equation by the radius, should I do the dot product or just multiply it commutatively. the reason I'm asking is the units when multiplying 0.12m by 0.23t + 0.12t^2 of course its m/t where t is in seconds. but after that I have to divide the answer by the moment of inertia which is kg m^2. Logicaly I know the answer should be in m/s^2 since its accelration and I also know that accelration could be written in N/kg, but here I have m(t)/kg m^2.

The problem gives the force without units.It should be Newtons.But the constants are given numerically:they should be measured,first in Newtons per second,and the second in Newtons per second squared.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
18K