Why Does a Chain Snap Between Train Cars at High Speeds in Relativity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the scenario of two train cars connected by a chain that snaps under relativistic conditions as they accelerate to high speeds. Participants explore the implications of special relativity, particularly length contraction and the effects of acceleration on the perceived distances and tensions in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that as the train cars accelerate, they undergo length contraction, which affects the chain's length, leading to the possibility of it snapping if it becomes too short.
  • Others argue that while the distance between the cars remains constant in a stationary frame, the perception of distance changes due to relativistic effects, suggesting that the chain may snap due to the relative motion of the cars.
  • A later reply questions whether the snapping of the chain is a real effect or merely a visual contraction observed from a stationary frame, raising doubts about the actual tension in the chain.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of the reference frame from which the acceleration is measured, noting that the interpretation of distances and contractions can vary significantly based on the observer's frame.
  • One participant suggests that if both cars are in the same reference frame, they should not experience the chain snapping, challenging the assumptions made by others regarding the effects of relativity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the chain will snap or the conditions under which it would do so. Multiple competing views remain regarding the effects of length contraction, reference frames, and the nature of the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of acceleration and reference frames, as well as unresolved questions about the actual physical effects versus visual perceptions in relativistic scenarios.

Moth
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have been informed that if:

There is two train cars connected by a chain that will snap if extended by more than 1%.
The cars accelerate at exactly the same rate, so the distance between them remains constant.
As they speed up to very high velocity and special theory of relativity start making things interesting the chain will snap.

Why is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, when we say the two cars accelerate at the same rate and maintain a constant distance, we first have to ask ourselves: According to who? From the way this situation is stated we can assume that it is meant that this is according to the frame tha the cars are accelerating with respect to and not according to the cars themselves.

In this case, as seen from this frame:

As the cars gain speed, they undergo length contraction, as does the chain. Since the distance between the cars remains constant, but the chain grows shorter, the chain snaps when its contracted length is short enough.

From the car's frame. Since the cars are both in accelerated frames, the time rate in each train varies along the distance separating them. As seen from the cars, time in the lead car runs faster than time in the trailing car. Thus the lead car sees the trailing cars as falling behind, and the trailing car sees the leading car as pulling ahead. The chain length however does not change. The two cars see themselves as pulling apart (they do not maintain the same distance) and the chain snaps under this strain.
 
As the cars gain speed, they undergo length contraction, as does the chain. Since the distance between the cars remains constant, but the chain grows shorter, the chain snaps when its contracted length is short enough.

Actually, the distance is increasing -- the distance between the tails of the trains remains constant, but not the distance between the front of the rear train and the rear of the front train. (because of length contraction)
 
What am I missing here?

You have a train car of some length, followed by a chain of some length, followed by another train car. They accelerate, and all the lengths get Lorentz contracted in the stationary frame. The cars get shorter, the chain gets shorter, and the distance between the cars gets shorter.

Can't you just think about all three pieces as being one big stick with two marks on it dividing into three sections?
 
Not if you take

"The cars accelerate at exactly the same rate"

to mean

"it is meant that this is according to the frame tha the cars are accelerating with respect to".


If the front and rear trains undergo the same acceleration, as measured in the stationary frame, then the displacement between them1 will remain a constant, as measured in the stationary frame.


In order for the train - chain - train system to appear unperturbed to a passenger, the front of the system must always accelerate less than the rear of the system. (whether measured by the passenger or the stationary frame!)


1: Precisely, I mean the amount you would have to translate one train to put it at the exact place of the other train
 
Janus said:
As the cars gain speed, they undergo length contraction, as does the chain. Since the distance between the cars remains constant, but the chain grows shorter, the chain snaps when its contracted length is short enough.

Though isn't this just a visual contraction from stationary observer? Is it an actual effect on tension or is it a visual? Would the chain really break to only length contraction? (ignoring for now the slight time dilation that both trains experiencing causing the train traveling forward to seeemingly pull ahead, the other seeming its falling behind.)
 
Moth said:
I have been informed that if:

There is two train cars connected by a chain that will snap if extended by more than 1%.
The cars accelerate at exactly the same rate, so the distance between them remains constant.
As they speed up to very high velocity and special theory of relativity start making things interesting the chain will snap.

Why is this?

I don't see why the chain would snap, because both cars are in the same reference frame, and according to SR, it is as if they are stationary together.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 83 ·
3
Replies
83
Views
9K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 85 ·
3
Replies
85
Views
8K