Finding the Coefficient of Friction: Wrong Answer and Need to Fix

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a block being pushed against a ceiling with an applied force at an angle. The original poster presents their calculations, which yield a different coefficient than expected.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the components of forces acting on the block, including gravitational force and the normal force. There are attempts to clarify how to correctly account for these forces in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on recalculating the normal force by considering the vertical forces acting on the block. There is ongoing exploration of the correct approach to derive the coefficient of friction, with multiple interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that gravity was initially overlooked in the calculations, which may have contributed to the discrepancies in the results. The problem context includes specific values and conditions that are critical for determining the coefficient of friction.

Port
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
ok i worked out the problem but i got the wrong answer. the values i got are: for normal force=69.62N. for ap=12.19. for af=6.19. for Ff=24.8N final answer=.356 and i need .816 what did i do wrong?

here is the problem again:
A 4kg block is pushed alomng the ceiling with a constant apllied force of 85N that acts at an angle of 55 degrees with the horizontal. The block accelerates to the right at 6m/s^2. detremine the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the ceiling.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get 0.814 (close enough I hope).

Port your normal force is wrong. There are 3 forces along the vertical... gravity, the vertical component of the 85N, and the normal force. All 3 add to zero.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I deleted my last post after realising my mistake. I forgot to take weight of the mass into account

The correct answer is [itex]\mu = 0.814[/itex].

The expression is [tex]\mu = \frac{F\cos\theta - ma}{F\sin\theta - mg}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
wait could u explain how u got that please??
 
Port said:
wait could u explain how u got that please??

Ok. Sum of forces in y direction;

85sin55 - mg - Fn =0

Solve for Fn

You'll get 30.4N

The your coefficient of friction is 24.8/30.4= 0.816
 
omg i love u thanks so much! (its a gratitute type love ok!)
 
Yeah, port we forgot to take into account gravity originally so take the normal force you had subtract(i think) gravity, and then use that as the normal force, it should work
 
Port said:
wait could u explain how u got that please??

Consider the forces acting on the mass. There is a 85 N force angled at 55 degrees to the horizontal pushing the mass to the right and there is a gravitational force acting vertically downwards. There is also a frictional force acting to the left impeding the motion of the mass. Finally, as a result of the mass being pushed against the ceiling there is a normal force of the ceiling on the mass, which acts vertically downwards.

Can you see that the block is in equilibrium in a vertical direction and in disequilibrium in a horizontal direction ? This is why the block doesn't move up or down, only to the right.

Resolve the 85 N pushing force into horizontal and vertical components. Now come up with equations that relate all the forces we discussed above. You should have one equation for the horizontal forces and one for the vertical. Finally, from your knowledge of the relationship between the frictional force and the normal force, you can derive an expression for [itex]\mu[/itex]

Sometimes it's harder to explain how to do stuff than just give away the solution. :smile:
 
Yapper said:
Yeah, port we forgot to take into account gravity originally so take the normal force you had subtract(i think) gravity, and then use that as the normal force, it should work

Strange that we ALL forgot gravity initially. Must be something bad in the ether.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
22K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
10K