Is the Use of F=γma Correct in Special Relativity Calculations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the formula F=γma in special relativity calculations. Participants clarify that while this formula can be used, it requires careful consideration of the variable nature of γ (Lorentz factor) as it depends on velocity. The correct approach involves recognizing that F=dp/dt leads to F=γm(dv/dt) + mv(dγ/dt), which introduces additional complexity due to the time dependence of γ. Ultimately, the energy conservation method is recommended as a more straightforward alternative for solving problems in special relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts, particularly the Lorentz factor (γ).
  • Familiarity with the relationship between force, momentum, and acceleration.
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically differentiation with respect to time.
  • Basic principles of energy conservation in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Lorentz factor (γ) in special relativity.
  • Learn how to apply the conservation of energy method in relativistic contexts.
  • Explore the relationship between force and momentum in special relativity.
  • Investigate advanced calculus techniques for handling time-dependent variables in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in the application of special relativity principles in problem-solving, particularly in the context of force and momentum.

athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


attachment.php?attachmentid=45796&stc=1&d=1333329309.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Can I do it like this:
[itex]F=γma[/itex]
[itex]F=γm\frac{dv}{dt}[/itex]
[itex]F=γm\frac{dv}{ds}\frac{ds}{dt}[/itex]
[itex]v\frac{dv}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}=\frac{F ds}{m}[/itex]

The finial answer will becom
v=[itex]\frac{\sqrt{2c^2mFx-Fx}}{mc}[/itex]

What's wrong?
 

Attachments

  • hw1.JPG
    hw1.JPG
    25.3 KB · Views: 558
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]F=\frac{dp}{dt}[/tex]
[tex]F=\frac{d}{dt}(\gamma mv)[/tex]
[tex]F=\gamma m \frac{dv}{dt} + mv\frac{d\gamma}{dt}[/tex]

Because gamma is a function of v and varies with time, you run into problems. You should still be able to solve it this way if you take the extra term into account, but it's a lot more work than energy conservation method.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K