The Big Bang & Its Mysterious Origins: Seeking Thoughts & Ideas

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the origins of the universe, specifically the Big Bang theory and alternative models such as the "Big Ting." Participants explore concepts related to the nature of the universe's expansion, the absence of a center, and the implications of these ideas on the understanding of cosmic events.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the notion of a "center" in the universe, noting that the universe does not have a center or edge.
  • There is a distinction made between the Big Bang as an "explosion" and as a rapid expansion of space, with some arguing that the term "Big Bang" is misleading.
  • One participant proposes the "Big Ting" model, suggesting that the universe could have started from a state of ultrahigh temperature and then cooled, raising questions about energy conservation and the nature of expansion.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of the term "expansion," with some suggesting it implies a void into which space is expanding.
  • Participants discuss the idea of a simultaneous event affecting the entire universe, likening it to a gong hitting a bell, and question how this relates to the concept of a singularity.
  • There is speculation about detecting temperature changes in the early universe and how shrinking matter and energy might affect gravitational and quantum effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the Big Bang and its implications, with no consensus reached on the terminology or the models proposed. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the validity of the "Big Ting" model versus traditional interpretations of the Big Bang.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in language and definitions when discussing cosmic events, indicating that assumptions about the nature of space and expansion may not be universally accepted.

Mr_Euchre
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
There was a section in Greene's book that actually helped me form a curious idea about the origins of the universe and I wanted anyone's thoughts on it. If there was only one Big Bang, then shouldn't there be a concentration of matter/gas in the region of the center as everything spreads in all directions?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
which centre? the universe apparently does not have a centre. strange, I know. it also does not have an edge. crazy stuff
 
which centre?

The center of the "explosion."
 
The "Big Bang" was not an "explosion"
just the earliest part of the expansion that started a little before the origin of the CBR we can still see today.
 
Welcome to Physics Forums, Mr Euchre.

Like RandallB said, the Big Bang was not an explosion of stuff into space. (the "Big Bang" is a poor, misleading name...but a catchy one)

The Big Bang was the rapid expansion of all space. Essentially, the Big Bang happened simultaneously everywhere in the universe. We do not see concentration of matter toward any center or any preferred motion of things away from any center. There is no center or edge to 3D space.

With the rapid expansion of all-space, the energy in it cooled...eventually enough for atoms to form and then stars, galaxies, & planets...throughout the universe.
 
Phobos said:
(the "Big Bang" is a poor, misleading name...but a catchy one)
Do you have any suggestions for a more accurate descriptive name?

Phobos said:
The Big Bang was the rapid expansion of all space.
Doesn't this kind of suggest that there is some kind of void into which space is expanding? (i.e Expanding relative to what?)

If we say that it's merely expanding relative to itself, then how would that be any different than imagining that it started out extremely large (possibly infinite) and then there was the Big Ting? Like a gong hitting a bell, only the gone hits the entire universe at once (every point in preexisting space simultaneously). Forget about SR, nothing was moving prior to the Big Ting so everywhere in the universe was in the same frame of reference so it makes sense to talk about a simultaneous Ting.

The Ting was so powerful that the entire universe burst into a state of ultrahigh temperature. As it cooled it condensed and everything in it started shrinking. How would that be different than an expanding universe?

I think that the only difference is in where the energy goes. The idea is that when things expand they cool, so the expansion supposedly explains energy conservation. In the Big Ting model the energy would need to somehow radiate away from the universe like the ringing sound leaves a bell.

Although, if string theory is correct, then we have the explanation that gravity waves radiate away from the universe carrying with them the dissipative energy and the ringing of the Ting.

I believe in the Big Ting model myself. :approve:
 
NeutronStar said:
Doesn't this kind of suggest that there is some kind of void into which space is expanding? (i.e Expanding relative to what?)

Yeah, personally, I think the word "expansion" also has the wrong connotation for what the universe is doing...but such are the limitations of our language.

If we say that it's merely expanding relative to itself, then how would that be any different than imagining that it started out extremely large (possibly infinite) and then there was the Big Ting? Like a gong hitting a bell, only the gone hits the entire universe at once (every point in preexisting space simultaneously). Forget about SR, nothing was moving prior to the Big Ting so everywhere in the universe was in the same frame of reference so it makes sense to talk about a simultaneous Ting.

No immediate response to this...although it reminds me of some of the discussions in the general astronomy forum (marcus?) about defining the Big Bang "singularity" (a point vs. a uniform/undifferentiated state of spacetime)

The Ting was so powerful that the entire universe burst into a state of ultrahigh temperature.

So would you expect to detect a temperature ramp up in the early universe? (at a time less then 10e-43 seconds perhaps?)

As it cooled it condensed and everything in it started shrinking. How would that be different than an expanding universe?

Shrinking matter & energy? (ongoing)
Seems like this would mess with gravitational & quantum effects in a way that we don't see.

I believe in the Big Ting model myself.

It's just one ting after another. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K