Help Solve a Mystery: Lawden's "An Introduction to Tensor Calculus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Lawden's book, "An Introduction to Tensor Calculus, Relativity and Cosmology," specifically regarding Expression 39.13 on page 109. The user seeks clarification on the diagonalization of symmetric quadratic forms, asserting that all symmetric matrices are similar to the identity matrix, implying their eigenvalues are all 1. The quadratic form is expressed as d s^2 = g_{ij} d x^i d x^j, where g_{ij} is the symmetric metric tensor. Lawden states that this quadratic form can be reduced to a diagonal form through a proper choice of coefficients, which may include imaginary values, indicating that at stationary points of the metric tensor, a locally Cartesian coordinate frame can be established.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of symmetric quadratic forms
  • Familiarity with metric tensors in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, particularly eigenvalues and diagonalization
  • Basic comprehension of tensor calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of symmetric matrices and their diagonalization
  • Study the implications of metric tensors in general relativity
  • Explore the concept of locally flat spacetime in physics
  • Learn about the role of imaginary coefficients in mathematical transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those interested in tensor calculus, general relativity, and linear algebra applications.

PBRMEASAP
Messages
191
Reaction score
2
Hi,

Anyone out there have Lawden's book, "An Introduction to Tensor Calculus, Relativity and Cosmology"? Expression 39.13 (on p 109) and the sentence that precedes it have me stumped. My understanding of what he's saying is that a symmetric quadratic form can always be diagonalized so that the coefficients are 1. I was not aware of this. It seems to me that's the same thing as saying all symmetric matrices are similar to the identity--that is, its eigenvalues are all 1. If someone could clear this up for me it would be awesome. By the way, I know this is more of a linear algebra question, but I mentioned it in here because I figured people in this forum might be familiar with the book.

thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay I figured out some of that typesetting stuff so I can actually write what Lawden says.

We have the quadratic form

[tex] d s^2 = g_{ij} d x^i d x^j[/tex]

where [tex]g_{ij}[/tex] is the (symmetric) metric tensor at point A, [tex]x^i = a^i[/tex]. Define the y-coordinates by the relation

[tex] x^i = b^i{}_{j} y^j[/tex],

which is to say

[tex] d x^i = b^i{}_{j} d y^j[/tex].

Lawden says, "...it is a well known result from algebra that the quadratic form [tex]g_{ij} d x^i d x^j[/tex] can be reduced to the diagonal form

[tex](d y^1)^2 \ + \ (d y^2)^2 \ + \ ... \ + \ (d y ^N)^2[/tex]

at the point A by proper choice of the [tex]b^i{}_j[/tex] (some of these coefficients may have to be given imaginary values)." This is important because he is showing that at points where the metric tensor is stationary, a coordinate frame can be chosen that is locally Cartesian. At any rate, I'm not familiar with this well known result from algebra. If anyone is, please explain it to me.

thanks!
 
I really need to start coming up with catchier titles for my posts. I hearby rename this thread "Is spacetime locally flat, and how does this affect consciousness from a positivist point of view, in light of recent work by Popper?". Just kidding, someone answered my question in the algebra forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K