Determining Ground State in L-S Coupling Scheme for (3d)4

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the ground state in the L-S coupling scheme for the (3d)4 electron configuration. According to Hund's rules, the maximum spin value (S) is 2. The maximum orbital angular momentum (L) cannot be 8, as this would violate the Pauli exclusion principle due to the limited number of electrons and their corresponding quantum states. Instead, the maximum allowed value of L is 4, which accommodates the necessary distinct values of (m (sub l)) for the four electrons in the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of L-S coupling scheme
  • Familiarity with Hund's rules
  • Knowledge of the Pauli exclusion principle
  • Basic quantum mechanics concepts related to angular momentum
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle in multi-electron systems
  • Explore the derivation of Hund's rules in detail
  • Learn about the quantum states of electrons in different configurations
  • Investigate the relationship between total angular momentum (J) and its components (L and S)
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on atomic structure and electron configurations, as well as physicists working with angular momentum in multi-electron systems.

secret2
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
When doing L-S coupling scheme for (3d)4, I am asked to find the ground state. I know that the first step, according to Hund's rules, is to find the the S with the largest value (S, L are total values, s, l are individual values). It is obviously S=2. Next, I should proceed to find the largest possible value of L. And here is my question: why can't we choose L=4*2=8? Why should we choose L=2?(Please continue reading)

The book says that anything larger than L=2 would have values of (m (sub L)) larger than 2, which is prohibited by the Pauli exclusive principle because no two electrons can have same pair of (m (sub l)) and (m (sub s)). However, why do we have to throw away the whole set of states with a specific L just because some (m (sub L)) are illegal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well,each time u have an "L",u have the "2L+1" values of "m" to go along...Now if L=3,then in principle m_{l}=3 (okay?).But if u cannot have m_{l}=3,then it would make no sense in including the L=3 (which automatically would induce m_{l}=3)...

Daniel.
 


In the L-S coupling scheme, the total angular momentum (J) is given by the vector sum of the orbital angular momentum (L) and the spin angular momentum (S). In the case of (3d)4, the maximum possible value of S is 2, as you have correctly identified. However, the maximum possible value of L is not simply 4*2=8, but rather it is limited by the number of electrons in the system.

In the (3d)4 system, there are 4 electrons, each with a spin of either +1/2 or -1/2. This means that there are only 2 possible combinations of spin states for the 4 electrons: ++--, --++, or any combination in between. In order to satisfy the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two electrons can have the same set of quantum numbers, the values of (m (sub s)) must be different for each electron. This means that for a given value of S, there can only be a certain number of allowed values of (m (sub l)).

In the case of L=8, there would be 5 allowed values of (m (sub l)): -8, -6, -4, -2, 0. However, since there are only 4 electrons, one of these values would have to be repeated, violating the Pauli exclusion principle. Therefore, the maximum possible value of L in this system is actually 4, which corresponds to the allowed values of (m (sub l)) for a total of 4 electrons: -4, -2, 0, 2.

In summary, we cannot choose L=8 in the L-S coupling scheme for (3d)4 because it would lead to a violation of the Pauli exclusion principle. We must choose the maximum allowed value of L, which in this case is 4, in order to satisfy the rules of quantum mechanics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K