Is 3^4 the Correct Answer? - Erin

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Erin_Sharpe
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the correctness of mathematical expressions involving exponents and logarithms. Participants are examining the calculations presented by Erin and seeking clarification on notation and interpretation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Erin presents a calculation involving exponents and asks for confirmation on the correctness of the result.
  • Some participants agree with Erin's first calculation but question the notation and interpretation of the logarithmic expression.
  • There is confusion regarding the second expression, with Erin asserting that it is written correctly as log68.
  • Participants request clarification on the notation used in the logarithmic expression, suggesting that it may be ambiguous.
  • One participant emphasizes the need for clearer notation to avoid misunderstandings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the correctness of the first calculation but have differing views on the interpretation of the logarithmic expression, leading to unresolved confusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential ambiguities in mathematical notation, which may affect the interpretation of the logarithmic expression. Specific definitions and assumptions about notation are not clarified.

Erin_Sharpe
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
(3^5/3^3)^2
= 3^2+2
=3^4
= 81

3log6-log612 + log62=
log68

as a final answer?

Appreciate it if someone could tell me if I'm right or not.

Thanks,
Erin
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You got the first one right.
In the second one, do you mean log63 ?
 
how did u get the second answer...? because i really did get log68
 
He is asking to rewrite your second problem correctly. What does the 6 mean in the first term?
 
oh i see now. but, no i don't mean log63...its written in the text exactly the way I wrote it.
 
Erin sharpe:
You HAVE to use a less ambiguous notation!
Do you mean:
a) [tex]3log_{6}[/tex]
b) [tex]3log(6)[/tex]

And do you mean:
c) [tex]log_{6}(12)[/tex]
Or
d)[tex]log(612)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
232K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K