The Mysteries of RADAR: Size Limitations and Detection Capabilities

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter podpod
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the detection capabilities of radar systems, specifically focusing on the size limitations of objects that can be detected. Participants explore the factors influencing radar detection, including object size, radar wavelength, and radar cross-section (RCS).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the minimum size of an object detectable by radar, asking if a fly could be detected or if only larger objects like airplanes are visible.
  • Another participant states that for an object to be detected by radar, it must reflect the radar waves and be significantly larger than the radar's wavelength, suggesting that a fly would not meet these criteria.
  • A further contribution complicates the discussion by introducing the concept of radar cross-section (RCS), noting that different objects can have varying RCS values, which affect their detectability.
  • It is mentioned that radar absorbing materials can reduce RCS but do not eliminate detectability entirely.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of radar power and sensitivity in detecting objects, indicating that these factors also play a critical role in detection capabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the complexity of radar detection, with some focusing on basic principles while others introduce more nuanced concepts like RCS. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific size limits for detection.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about radar technology, the dependence on specific radar systems, and the lack of consensus on the minimum detectable size of objects.

podpod
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question which should fit in here:

- How big in size may an object be before it's noticed on a radar screen?

Could it detect a fly if it's designed to do that, or must the size be in a airplane dimension?

I hope that someone can think of a good answer to this question :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the object must satisfly these two conditions in order to be detected by radar

1: It must reflect the radar ray... even the B2 bomber is so large, but it has a coating on its skin to absorb radar ray, therefore radar can't detect it
2: the object must much larger than the wavelength of the radar ray you used... for a normal aircraft used radar, the wave length is about 3cm...

a fly don't reflect the radiowave very well, and too small compare with the radar's wavelength
 
Well, it's bit more complicated than that.

http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?id=radar-reflectivity1

An important element is http://www.argospress.com/Resources/radar/radarcrossectio.htm . A square metal can of a few inches could have a RCS of 10m2 while a stealth fighter may have a RCS of a marble.

Radar absorbing paint may only reduce the RCS, it's not making it dissapear.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks guys, a lot of usefull information there ;)
 
Of course, the amount of power transmitted by the radar, and the radar's sensitivity to its echoes, are very important, too.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
7K