Question regarding bonding in liquid.

  • Thread starter Thread starter walker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonding Liquid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment investigating the behavior of different liquids—water, paint thinner, and vegetable oil—when stirred to create a vortex. Participants explore the relationship between intermolecular bonding and the resulting vortex characteristics, including depth and duration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant observed that water produced the deepest vortex and took the longest to disappear, suggesting this may be due to stronger hydrogen bonds.
  • Another participant claimed that most oils have stronger intermolecular bonding than water, citing boiling points as a comparison.
  • Discussion about the composition of paint thinner, with some participants suggesting it may contain long chain hydrocarbons, while others mentioned acetone.
  • A participant noted that the viscosity of the oil and paint thinner could explain their vortex behavior, proposing that greater intermolecular bonding leads to higher viscosity, making it harder to sustain a velocity gradient.
  • One participant provided specific chemical compositions for the liquids, indicating that water exhibits hydrogen bonding, while paint thinner is associated with van der Waals forces and vegetable oil with dipole bonding.
  • There was confusion regarding the relative strength of hydrogen bonds compared to other intermolecular forces, with one participant questioning how vegetable oil, which is slightly polar, could fail to create a vortex.
  • Another participant suggested that the stronger bonding in water may facilitate better momentum transfer from the stirrer, influencing vortex depth.
  • A different experiment yielded contrasting results, with paint thinner producing the deepest vortex, raising questions about potential experimental errors.
  • Clarification was made that while hydrogen bonds are stronger, the total intermolecular bonding energy of larger oil molecules may exceed that of water.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing results and interpretations regarding the vortex behavior of the liquids, indicating that multiple competing views remain. There is no consensus on the underlying reasons for the observed phenomena.

Contextual Notes

Participants noted various assumptions about the nature of intermolecular forces and their effects on viscosity and vortex behavior, but these assumptions remain unresolved and subject to further discussion.

walker
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
In an experiment related to bonding in liquid I was required to stir three liquids: Water, Paint Thinner, and Vegetable oil. Thereby creating a vortex in each liquid and recording the depth of the vortex plus the time the vortex took to disappear. My results where that water produced the deepest vortex as well as took the longest for the vortex to disappear.

Is this due to the stronger intermolecular bond in Hydrogen bonds?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Most oils have stronger intermolecular bonding than water. Remember, vegetable oils boil at about 300C while water boils only at 100C.

What is the paint thinner made of ? Can you read the primary composition off the label ? Is it acetone based or does it have some long chain hydrocarbons ?
 
Last edited:
When I think of paint thinner, I think of turpentine, not acetone. So, I'd assume it contains long chain hydrocarbons. If you don't have a label to check, your nose will know...did it smell like nailpolish remover (acetone) or a petroleum product (turpentine)? Both are volatile enough that if you were creating a vortex, you probably would have noticed the odor, even if trying to work in a hood.
 
I guess it's probably turpentine then. (I think I've used a conductive paint that used an acetone thinner or solvent, but I may be wrong).

So, the thinner and the vegetable oil are more viscous due to greater intermolecular bonding. And it's harder to sustain a velocity gradient in a more viscous fluid. From that, you can explain both effects.
 
http://michael_walker.shackspace.com/question.jpg

I've included the exact excerpt from my workbook.

From that we can see that the paint thinner is made up of methyl benzene (C6H5CH2) (toluene), is non-polar and is an example of van der Waals bonding.

The vegetable oil contains oleic acid (C17H33COOH) and is slightly polar which would be an example of dipole bonding.

And the water of course is an example of hydrogen bonding.

I'm still a little confused. You say that the viscous of the oil and paint thinner is due to greater molecular bonding. From what I've read, I was under the assumption that hydrogen bonds were actually the strongest of the three intermolecular forces (hydrogen, van der waals, dipole). That dipole were the weakest and that van der waals were dependent on the number of electrons within the molecule.

With all that being said. From my experiment I found the water to provide the greatest and longest vortex, the paint thinner to provide a slightly less vortex in terms of depth and time and the oil did not create a vortex at all.

So if the oil is made up of polar molecules meaning that the bonds between them are weak, wouldn't that mean that they would not conform to a vortex? The water molecules having the greatest amount of force between them they would conform to a vortex for a greater amount of time? The paint thinner being being non-polar and its force of van der waals bonding being the result of the shape and number of electrons would make it have a slight vortex yet not as long or as deep as water?

Like if you were to take a magnet and swirl it around in a bowl of other magnets the magnets will attract to each other and eventually you'll have this long chain of magnets making up a swirl... i hope that makes sense? is that what is happening with the water molecules? they're forming a vortex because I am swirling them around and they're trying to stay attached to each other?
 
You could be right. I'll have to think about this a little more, but it seems that the stronger bonding in the case of water helps transfer momentum from the stirrer to the liquid better than oil or thinner. I think the faster the liquid swirls, the deeper will be the vortex. Viscosity should also play a role (and one would expect this to be directly related to the intermolecular bonding), but it may only be a second order effect. I'm not sure if the greater viscosity of oil comes from actually stronger bonding (the molecules are pretty long, so the bonding may end up being fairly strong) or only due to geometric factors (the ability of the molecular chains to interlock.)
Code:
       /\/\/\/\/\/\/\-COOH
HOOC-/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
But toluene is less viscous than water so clearly, it's not the viscosity that's the determining factor.
 
I am doing the same experiment, but I got different results. Paint Thinner produced the deepest vortex and took the longest time to disappear. Water and Paint Thinner were very similar, but Vegetable Oil took the least time to go away, and made the smallest vortex.
One of the questions is: Why is water so much differentfrom the other substances in time and depth of vortex. But in my experiment it wasn't much different from Paint thinner. Did I do something wrong?
 
Just to clarify what was said above: Hydrogen bonds are indeed the stronger bond.
Oils are just much larger molecules, so their *total* intermolecular bonding energy is greater than that of water.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
20K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K