Solve Quantum Mech Problem: Find N for Normalized Wavefunction

  • Thread starter Thread starter IanSimcox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem concerning the normalization of a wavefunction. The original poster is tasked with finding a normalization constant N for the wavefunction U(x) = N exp(-((x-y)^2)/2a^2), where a and y are constants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the concept of normalization in the context of quantum mechanics, with some questioning the understanding of what normalization entails. There is an attempt to clarify that the square modulus of the wavefunction must be integrated over all space.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the definition of normalization and how to apply it to the given wavefunction. Some guidance has been provided regarding the need to integrate the square modulus, but no consensus or resolution has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of uncertainty regarding the fundamental concepts of normalization in quantum mechanics, which may affect the participants' ability to proceed with the problem.

IanSimcox
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm not sure this is the correct topic for this question, but I shall ask anyway.

I've been set this question for homework and I'm not too sure where to start.

Find N so that the state |U> with Schrödinger position representation wavefunction U(x) = N exp(-((x-y)^2)/2a^2) is normalised, where a and y are real constants.

Hopefully from there I will be able to do the rest of the question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know what 'normalised' means? Look it up!
 
Ok this could make me look like an idiot either way (probably coz I'm not too sure of what I'm about to say, I should listen more), but I think it means that if I integrate U(x) from -infinte to +infinite then the answer should be 1. If it is I feel kinda silly not havin thought of doing that.
 
No,u have to integrate the square modulus...of the wave function.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K