Calculating Speed of Cars Prior to Collision: Mass, Velocity After Impact

  • Thread starter Thread starter Garvage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a collision between two cars at an intersection, focusing on calculating their speeds prior to the impact. The problem involves concepts from momentum and velocity in a physics context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of formulas related to momentum and velocity, questioning their applicability given the scenario of two moving cars. There are inquiries about handling negative velocities and the need to break down velocities into components.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring different formulas and their relevance to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conservation of momentum, but there remains uncertainty about the initial speeds and the correct application of the formulas.

Contextual Notes

Participants note a potential lack of information regarding the initial speeds of the cars, which is crucial for solving the problem. There is also discussion about the implications of negative velocities based on chosen reference directions.

Garvage
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Two cars collide at an intersection. The first car has a mass of 925kg and was traveling north. The second car has a mass of 1075kg and was traveling west. Immediatly after impact, the first car had a velocity of 52km/hr, 310deg, and the second car had a velocity of 40km/hr, 320deg. What was the speed of each car prior to the collision?

Ok.
Is there a velocity formula I can use? One In terms ov V and M?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think these are the formulas, but I'm not sure.

[tex]V_{1}=\left(\begin{array}(\underline{(M_{1}+M_{2})}\\(M_{1}-M_{2})\end{array}\right)V_{1}'[/tex]

[tex]V_{2}=\left(\begin{array}({(2M_{1})}\\\overline{(M_{1}-M_{2})}\end{array}\right)V_{2}'[/tex]

Can anyone help?
 
Yes, those equations are right.
 
What about getting the right directions? When I use those equations the velocity comes out to be negative. Do I just switch the direction?
 
Garvage said:
I think these are the formulas, but I'm not sure.

[tex]V_{1}=\left(\begin{array}(\underline{(M_{1}+M_{2})}\\(M_{1}-M_{2})\end{array}\right)V_{1}'[/tex]

[tex]V_{2}=\left(\begin{array}({(2M_{1})}\\\overline{(M_{1}-M_{2})}\end{array}\right)V_{2}'[/tex]

Can anyone help?
Correction:
This formula only applies when a moving ball (A) collides with a stationary ball (B). In this case, you can't use this equation. Rather, you have to use conservation of linear momentum (break down into horiz and vert components). The final and initial horizontal momentum is always conserved. The same goes for the vertical momentum.
 
So, after I break up the V1' and V2' velocities into horizontal and vertical vectors, can I solve for all four using those formulas? Aslo, what do I do about the velocities being negative since [tex]M_{1}-M_{2}[/tex] is negative?
 
Garvage said:
So, after I break up the V1' and V2' velocities into horizontal and vertical vectors, can I solve for all four using those formulas? Aslo, what do I do about the velocities being negative since [tex]M_{1}-M_{2}[/tex] is negative?
I don't think you can use those formulae at all, since both masses are moving initially. As far as negative velocities, they simply mean the mass is traveling in a negative direction (this can be anywhere, since it depends what you define as the "positive" direction).
 
Well, that's not good news. Are there any formulae I can use?
 
As far as I know, only

[tex]Momentum_{horiz/initial}=Momentum_{hor/final}[/tex]

and

[tex]Momentum_{vert/initial}=Momentum_{vert/final}[/tex]

The only problem is, it seems you're missing one piece of information reguarding the initial speeds.
 
  • #10
Yeah, what I am missing is what it's asking me to find.
 
  • #11
Oh yeah, I read the question again, and you do have enough info. Do you understand how to solve it now? :rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K