Finding the X Component of the Center of Mass of a Cut-Out Square Plate

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the center of mass of a uniform square plate with a square section cut out from one side. The dimensions of the plate and the cut-out section are specified, and the coordinate system is defined with the origin at the center of the plate. The participants are tasked with determining the X and Y components of the center of mass, with the Y component already established as zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various methods for calculating the X component, including splitting the plate into sections and using weighted averages. Some express uncertainty about the correctness of their approaches.
  • Questions arise regarding the completeness of the problem statement, particularly about the positioning of the cut-out section and its implications for symmetry.
  • Several participants suggest decomposing the figure into rectangles to simplify the calculation of the center of mass.
  • Alternative methods are proposed, including treating the entire plate as a mass with a center of mass at the origin and considering the cut-out section as a negative mass.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations and methods for solving the problem. Some have provided calculations and reasoning, while others are seeking clarification on specific aspects of the problem. There is no explicit consensus on a single approach, but several productive lines of reasoning have been presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may lack sufficient detail regarding the placement of the cut-out section, which could affect the calculations. The assumption of uniform density and thickness is mentioned, and the use of area as a proxy for mass is suggested.

BlasterV
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A uniform square plate L = 5.9 m on a side as a square section d = 2.5 m cut out of one side.

What is the center of mass of the remaining plate? Use a coordinate system with origin (0, 0) at the center of the plate.

The answer must be given in components.

X = ?
Y = ?. From the picture it is obvious the Y component is 0, so Y = 0 is correct. (and the auto-grade says correct also, so Y = 0 ).

However, exactly how to find the X component I can't figure out.

I tried 2-3 different ways of doing it, and none have worked, does anyone know exactly how to solve this problem for the X component? I tried a few things like splitting it up and using weighted averages but it is not working or I have the wrong equation.

Thanks! I am attaching a picture of the problem.
 

Attachments

  • cutplate.gif
    cutplate.gif
    2.3 KB · Views: 645
Physics news on Phys.org
BlasterV said:
I tried a few things like splitting it up and using weighted averages but it is not working or I have the wrong equation.

Thanks! I am attaching a picture of the problem.

This should work. Can you show your calculations ?

marlon
 
(Assume it is constant 1kg)

(5.9m(1kg) ) / (1kg) = 5.9m <- from the Y axis, for center 5.9/2 = 2.95m
This goes for top and bottom sections.

(5.9m-2.5m)(1kg) / (1kg) <- 3.4m <- from the Y ais, for center 5.9/2 = 1.7m

1.7m(1kg) + 2.95m(1kg) + 2.95(1kg) / (3kg) = 2.53m

Since the origin (0,0) is in center of Square, center of x = 2.95m, 2.53 - 2.95 = -.417 m from the origin.

I don't think this is right, this is my work tho
 
BlasterV said:
A uniform square plate L = 5.9 m on a side as a square section d = 2.5 m cut out of one side.

What is the center of mass of the remaining plate? Use a coordinate system with origin (0, 0) at the center of the plate.

The answer must be given in components.

X = ?
Y = ?. From the picture it is obvious the Y component is 0, so Y = 0 is correct. (and the auto-grade says correct also, so Y = 0 ).

However, exactly how to find the X component I can't figure out.

I tried 2-3 different ways of doing it, and none have worked, does anyone know exactly how to solve this problem for the X component? I tried a few things like splitting it up and using weighted averages but it is not working or I have the wrong equation.

Thanks! I am attaching a picture of the problem.

First of all, the question is not complete. Are we given that the plate is cut out of the center of one side, so that the figure has a line of symmetry parallel to a side of the large square ?

Failing that condition, we have to take a general case, letting the distance between the top edge of the cut piece and one edge of the main plate be y, and then working out the center of mass in terms of y.

Divide the figure into 3 rectangles and find the center of mass of each in the coordinate system specified. See attached figure.

Then figure out the mass of each rectangle. In this case, you can use area as a proxy for mass, since the thickness and density are uniform.

Finally use the formula [tex]\Sigma m_i(x_i,y_i) = M(X,Y)[/tex] to derive an expression for the overall center of mass.

This is a rather tedious problem if you have to assume the general case.
 

Attachments

  • cutplate.gif
    cutplate.gif
    2.6 KB · Views: 722
Decompose the remaining plate into 3 rectangles and use the axis symmetry to find the result...

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
I am absolutely sure about Y = 0. Besides that, only things known are D and L
 
A far more elegant solution than decomposing into 3 rectangles is to take the big plate before cutting as one mass with center of mass at the origin. The second mass is a negative mass of the cut portion with the center of mass given in terms of the variable (depending on position). The final mass M is the difference between the two. This cuts down on a lot of calculation and yields the correct answer much more smartly.
 
Using my last method, here is the short and elegant solution.

Let the cut portion be taken out of the right edge such that the distance between the top edge of the cut portion and the top edge of the main plate is y.

M is the mass of the whole plate before cutting, m is the mass of the cut portion. Coordinates represented in square brackets to avoid confusion. [X, Y] is the position of the center of mass of the final figure.

Then :

[tex]M[0,0] - m[1.7,1.7 - y] = (M-m)[X,Y][/tex]

[tex](-(2.5)^2)[1.7, 1.7 - y] = (5.9^2 - 2.5^2)[X,Y][/tex]

[tex][X,Y] = \frac{6.25}{28.56}[-1.7, (y - 1.7)][/tex]
 

Attachments

  • cutplate.gif
    cutplate.gif
    2.5 KB · Views: 581
Last edited:
So the answer to the X component would be -1.7? or 6.25/28.56 * -1.7?
 
  • #10
BlasterV said:
So the answer to the X component would be -1.7? or 6.25/28.56 * -1.7?

The latter. The factor should be multiplied by each coordinate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K