Possible solution for dark energy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark energy Energy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a proposed mechanism for addressing the issue of dark energy through the lens of zero point energy in cosmological theories. Participants explore the implications of a paper by Robert D. Klauber, which suggests that certain solutions in quantum field theory (QFT) could lead to a zero or sensibly sized cosmological constant, potentially explaining dark energy observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the paper claims to resolve the problem of a large cosmological constant by proposing a mechanism that cancels zero point energy effects.
  • Others express uncertainty about the specific cancelling mechanism and seek clarification on how negative energy states in QFT might contribute to this cancellation.
  • One participant questions the characterization of certain solutions as "supplemental," arguing that changing frequency does not necessarily yield new solutions.
  • Another participant suggests that reversing time in the context of the theory may lead to a second set of solutions that could be relevant to understanding dark energy.
  • Discussion includes references to historical techniques in physics, such as the advanced-retarded wave approach, and its implications for understanding interactions in quantum mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the interpretation of the proposed mechanisms or the implications of the solutions discussed. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express limitations in their understanding of the paper and the concepts involved, indicating that further clarification is needed on specific technical aspects, such as the cancelling mechanism and the nature of the solutions discussed.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/astro-ph/0309679
Mechanism for vanishing zero point energy
Robert D klauber. Jan 2005.
This paper is way beyond my ken, if anyone has an interest, will
they please explain the basics.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The paper also suggests a solution to dark energy.
 
The problem with zero point energy in cosmological theories is that it leads to a ridculously large cosmological constant*, what this paper claims to do is to resove this problem by offering a mechaism so that the effect is cancels giving a zero cosmological constant. It also claim that slight assymetries could lead to non-zero, but sensibly sized cosmological constant that could explain the obsrevations of so-called dark energy.



* http://super.colorado.edu/~michaele/Lambda/phys.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By JCSD
The problem with zero point energy in cosmological theories is that it leads to a ridculously large cosmological constant*, what this paper claims to do is to resove this problem by offering a mechaism so that the effect is cancels giving a zero cosmological constant. It also claim that slight assymetries could lead to non-zero, but sensibly sized cosmological constant that could explain the obsrevations of so-called dark energy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yes i understood upto this point, but what is the cancelling mechanism?
 
Hmm you'd to ask one of the 'QFT guys' for detailed answer, but what it appears to tlak about is the inclusion of solutions in QFT previosuly disgarded for representing negtive enegry states that cancel out the effects of zero point energy in cosmologicla models.
 
Do you think it best to move this thread, if so will a moderator please
do so.
 
He talks about negative frequencies and supplemental solutions.
I guess this means that that the negative portion of the field is
ignored in calculating the total energy, and if it is included the
total energy is near to zero, this is obviously a very simplistic
explanation, and i cannot see why it has been ignored by others
if it that obvious.
 
I do not understand why does the author claim that these are "supplemental" solutions. I think that when one expands the field (e.g. the Klein-Gordon field) in Fourier modes, these modes form a complete basis of solutions to the field equation. Changing w to -w may result in a change of basis, but not in a new solution. Am I wrong? Actually, this is not a relativity but a QFT question.
 
I think he may very well be re-interpreting the solutions, unfortunately I don't really know enough to comment.
 
  • #10
Thankyou for your help JCSD , but i am far from an understanding
of this paper, if anyone has some inkling as to what it is about i will
be happy to here from them
 
  • #11
Interesting approach...
It is a scalar -tensor theory in which the scalar field is coupled to mass by the wave equation. Reversing time gives you a second set of solutions which are normally discarded, they go backwards in time, and the author finds that if these are included in a quantum field theory you end up with a gravitational theory that resolves the 'lambda' (ZPE) and the Dark Energy problems.

Garth
 
  • #12
By GARTH
Interesting approach...
It is a scalar -tensor theory in which the scalar field is coupled to mass by the wave equation. Reversing time gives you a second set of solutions which are normally discarded, they go backwards in time, and the author finds that if these are included in a quantum field theory you end up with a gravitational theory that resolves the 'lambda' (ZPE) and the Dark Energy problems.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank GARTH
By reversing time, is it meant that he is looking at the history of the field,
or is he reversing in a pure mathematical way?
 
  • #13
wolram said:
By GARTH
Interesting approach...
It is a scalar -tensor theory in which the scalar field is coupled to mass by the wave equation. Reversing time gives you a second set of solutions which are normally discarded, they go backwards in time, and the author finds that if these are included in a quantum field theory you end up with a gravitational theory that resolves the 'lambda' (ZPE) and the Dark Energy problems.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank GARTH
By reversing time, is it meant that he is looking at the history of the field,
or is he reversing in a pure mathematical way?
Most physical equations are time reversible, the entropy equation being an exception. Therefore solutions often arise in pairs, one represents forward time and the other reversed time, such as the retarded and advanced solutions of Maxwell's EM equations of EM. Drop a stone in a pond and the wave propagating outwards is represented by the retarded solution, a mathematical advanced solution would represent the wave converging onto the point and time where and when the stone enters the water, it doesn't exist in (our?) reality. [When I have patented my TV that picks up tomorrow's programmes by the advanced tv waves, I'll tell you and enter the lottery!].
Klauber seems to have done that with the scalar field wave equation.

Garth
 
Last edited:
  • #14
This advanced-retarded wave thing is an old technique. Recall Wheeler and Feynman did a version of electromagnetism based of it (I believe part of it was Feynmann's PhD thesis). And John Cramer's Transactional Interpretation of QM is based on the same idea with quantum wave functions. The key is that the waves in both directions of time get reflected and come back together and interact, giving physics.
 
  • #15
Enlightenment thanks, i think i will keep this one in the maybe file.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K