How to retrieve the lenght-contraction from the LT?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar987
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the length contraction formula from the Lorentz transformations. Participants explore how to represent proper length in terms of events and the implications of simultaneity in different reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in retrieving the length contraction formula from the Lorentz transformations and seeks clarification on representing proper length in terms of events.
  • Another participant suggests that to measure the distance between two moving objects, their positions must be located simultaneously, prompting a question about the times of events in the moving frame.
  • A participant notes that the transformation of position relies on both position and time, indicating that simultaneity is crucial for measuring distances in different frames.
  • One participant proposes that to find the length contraction formula, one must identify two events in the object's frame that are not simultaneous but correspond to simultaneous events in the observer's frame.
  • Another participant elaborates on a method involving parametric equations of motion for both ends of an object, emphasizing the importance of using an affine parameter to avoid confusion in time measurements.
  • A later reply revisits the original scenario, suggesting a method to measure the positions of the Earth and space station in the spaceship frame and deriving the expected length contraction result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to derive the length contraction formula, and multiple competing views and methods are presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of simultaneity in different frames, while others discuss the challenges of measuring distances between events that are not simultaneous in a moving frame. The discussion includes various assumptions about the reference frames and the nature of the events being analyzed.

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
I am trying to retrieve the lenght-contration formula from the Lorentz transformations (and am failing miserably). I'd appreciate if someonew could tell me where I'm mistaken. Thanks.

Actually I just don't know how to represent a proper length in terms of events, but here's my latest "attempt"...

The Lorentz transformation tell us how space-time points transform from an inertial coordinate to another. So suppose for exemple, that S is the coordinate system at rest with respect to Earth and some space station, and suppose S' is the system moving with speed +v (purely in the x direction) relative to S (a spaceship for instance). Suppose also that at t = 0, t' = 0 also and that at that time the origins O and O' coincide. Next, we need two events. Event 1, (say, a flash of light), will happen at t = t' = 0 and will happen at x = x' = 0. Event 2 happens simultaneously but at the space station, located, say, a distance x from the origin O. The LT tell us what is the space coordinate of that flash in the primes coordinate:

[tex]x' = \gamma(x -v0) = \gamma x[/tex]

So it's basically telling me that the distance Earth-Space Station is greater as seen from an observer in the spaceship. Evidently, this is not what I wanted to show. I would have liked to get the opposite, namely

[tex]x = \gamma x'[/tex]

How do we do this ?!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
Event 1, (say, a flash of light), will happen at t = t' = 0 and will happen at x = x' = 0. Event 2 happens simultaneously but at the space station, located, say, a distance x from the origin O. The LT tell us what is the space coordinate of that flash in the primes coordinate:

[tex]x' = \gamma(x -v0) = \gamma x[/tex]

So it's basically telling me that the distance Earth-Space Station is greater as seen from an observer in the spaceship.

Hint: When you measure the distance between two moving objects, you need to locate their positions simultaneously. What are the times of events 1 and 2 in the spaceship frame?
 
Event 1 we have defined to happen at [itex]t'_1 = 0[/itex] and event 2 will happen (before), at time

[tex]t'_2 = -\gamma \left(\frac{vx_2}{c^2}\right)[/tex]

But what does it matter? The transformation of position from S to S' only makes use of x and t:

[tex]x'_2 = \gamma (x_2 - vt_2)[/tex]

And t_2 is 0..


So as I understand your message, you're saying we cannot measure the distance between the two events in the moving coordinate system because we cannot measure their distance simultaneously. Then how do we get the lenght-contraction formula in terms of events and LT?
 
Last edited:
You have to find two events in the object's own frame, one at the position of the back end and one at the position of the front end, which are not simultaneous in the object's frame, but which map to simultaneous events in the observer's frame.
 
Last edited:
Oh, THAT's the trick.. thanks JesseM.
 
quasar987 said:
I am trying to retrieve the lenght-contration formula from the Lorentz transformations (and am failing miserably). I'd appreciate if someonew could tell me where I'm mistaken. Thanks.

Actually I just don't know how to represent a proper length in terms of events, but here's my latest "attempt"...

The length of an object in any frame is given by computing the distance between the ends of the object at the same time.

The proper length of an object is just the length of the object in its own reference frame.

One way of solving this problem is as follows:

Write down the parametric equations of motion of one end of the object Probably the easiest way to do this is to write

x1(lambda), y1lambda), z1(lambda), t1(lambda). Lambda can be any variable you like, the important thing is that as lambda progresses, it "traces out" the path that the object travels in space and time. If you don't know what variable to chose, make lambda the proper time of the point whose path through space-time you are tracing.

Repeat the procedure to write down the parametric equations of motion of the other end of the object.

x2(lambda), y2(lambda), z2(lambda), t2(lambda)

Now, all you need to do is to solve for a pair of lambda' so that t1(lambda1) = t2(lambda2), then you can compute the distance via the pythagorean theorem.

distance^2 = (x2-x1)^2 + (y2-y1)^2 + (z2-z1)^2 where you compute
x1,y1,z1 at lambda1 and x2,y2,z2 at lambda2.

lambda here is called an "affine parameter". You can use a seemingly more direct appraoch if you like, you can write the equations of motion as

x1(t), y1(t), z1(t) and x2(t), y2(t), z2(t)

if you like - but you'll have to be careful to use the same notion of time. In this case, when you go to a new frame, you have to transform two variables at once, and it's easy to get confused. By using an affine parameter lambda to describe the objects trajectory, it's easier to avoid being confused about which notion of time you are using at the moment.

Example:

In its own frame, the path throgh space-time of an object is very simple

x1=0, y1=0, z1=0, t1=lambda
x2=L, y1=0, z1=0, t2=lambda

In a moving frame, this becomes

x1 = gamma*(x1-v*t1) = -gamma*v*lambda1
y1=z1=0
t1 = gamma*(t1-v*x1/c^2) = gamma*lambda1

Repeat the procedure for x2,y2,z2,t2, solve for t1=t2, and compute the square root of the sum of the squares to get the distance. In this case, since y1=z1=0, the distance is just x2-x1.
 
Or, go back to quasar987's original situation, let the Earth be at the origin of both reference frames. In the spaceship frame, S', measure the Earth's position at time 0 (call this event #1):

[tex]x_1' = 0[/tex] and [tex]t_1' = 0[/tex]

Also in S', measure the location L of the space station at time 0 and call this event #2:

[tex]x_2' = L[/tex] and [tex]t_2' = 0[/tex]

These two events are not going to be at the same time in S, but that's OK because the Earth and the space station are both stationary in S, so they're always at the same locations in S.

[tex]x_1 = 0[/tex] and [tex]t_1 = 0[/tex]

[tex]x_2 = L_0[/tex] (the proper distance between Earth and space station) and [tex]t_2 =[/tex] unknown

Substitute the x's and t's into the Lorentz transformation equations, and you have two equations for the two unknowns L and [tex]t_2[/tex]. Solve them together and you get

[tex]L = \frac {L_0} {\gamma}[/tex]

as expected.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K