View Full Version : Transistors vs breast implants
Loren Booda
Sep23-03, 11:49 PM
What is the relationship, if any other than homophony, between silicon and silicone?
silicone is a polymer of alternating Si and O bonds.
radagast
Sep24-03, 09:47 AM
Originally posted by HazZy
silicone is a polymer of alternating Si and O bonds.
Don't forget the methyl group side chains.
monomer unit of [(CH3)2SiO]
well yeah of course, except it doesn't need to be methyl groups.
Another God
Sep25-03, 03:17 AM
Originally posted by HazZy
well yeah of course, except it doesn't need to be methyl groups.
LOL, yeah, 'of course'...because we all knew about them [6)]
it's clear when you look at the valence of silicon and what's sitting right above it in the periodic table [:)]. however it's not 1/10 as versatile or abundant as carbon, which is why we don't see silicon based life anywhere around here [8)].
Chemicalsuperfreak
Sep25-03, 01:43 PM
Originally posted by HazZy
it's clear when you look at the valence of silicon and what's sitting right above it in the periodic table [:)]. however it's not 1/10 as versatile or abundant as carbon, which is why we don't see silicon based life anywhere around here [8)].
It's clear by the valence that silicone needs a methyl or some other alkyl group? Wow, I didn't know that, and I'm an organic chemist. And I guess I should toss my geology notes, because they say silicon is a far more abundant element than carbon.
Originally posted by Chemicalsuperfreak
It's clear by the valence that silicone needs a methyl or some other alkyl group? Wow, I didn't know that, and I'm an organic chemist. And I guess I should toss my geology notes, because they say silicon is a far more abundant element than carbon. i was just saying that it's clear that silicone is not simply Si-O-Si-O..., which is what i said in the first reply. i never said "it's clear by the valence that silicone needs a methyl or some other alkyl group". please don't put words in my mouth...
and yeah silicon is more abundant in earth, but less abundant in the universe, i just got the two mixed up. which is just one of many reason silicon based life is not very likely in the universe. give me some slack, i wrote the last reply in math class...
radagast
Sep25-03, 09:24 PM
Originally posted by HazZy
it's clear when you look at the valence of silicon and what's sitting right above it in the periodic table [:)]. however it's not 1/10 as versatile or abundant as carbon, which is why we don't see silicon based life anywhere around here [8)].
Actually, you don't see them because they move slowly and are very clever. [:D]
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.