Relative phase in infinite square well

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of adding two steady state solutions in an infinite square well with a relative phase. Participants explore the implications of this addition, particularly focusing on specific cases of the phase parameter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formulation of the wavefunction that includes a relative phase and suggests that the only effect is a shift in the time origin.
  • Another participant challenges the notion that the special cases of phase (phi = pi/2 and pi) are meaningless, arguing that the addition of wavefunctions from stationary states has significance.
  • A further response questions the impact of adding specific phase values, suggesting that they do not yield any special results.
  • One participant asserts that the result leads to a non-stationary state, indicating a lack of other observable effects.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the relative phase and the outcomes of the wavefunction addition. There is no consensus on whether the special cases of phase yield meaningful insights or not.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the implications of the phase addition, and assumptions regarding the interpretation of the wavefunctions remain unaddressed.

painfive
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
This is a problem from my introductory quantum mechanics class. It's Griffifth's problem 2.6, if anyone has that book. The problem says to investigate the effect of adding two steady state solutions with a relative phase. Namely:

[tex]\Psi(x,0) = A [ \psi_1(x) + e^{i \phi} \psi_2 (x) ][/tex]

where:

[tex]\psi_n(x) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{a}} \sin \left(\frac{n \pi}{a} x\right)[/tex]

He says to compare this to the case with no relative phase, and to study the special cases of phi=pi/2 and pi. But I get that the only difference is that it effectively shifts the time origin. For example, I get:

[tex]|\Psi(x,t)|^2 = \frac{1}{a}\left[\sin^2\left(\frac{\pi x}{a}\right) + \sin^2\left(\frac{2\pi x}{a}\right) + 2\sin\left(\frac{\pi x}{a}\right) \sin\left(\frac{2\pi x}{a}\right) \cos\left(\frac{3 \pi^2 \hbar t}{2 m a^2} - \phi\right) \right][/tex]

This isn't anything that needs to be investigated, and the special cases look meaningless, which makes me think I've done something wrong. Have I?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean they look meaningless...?I think not.You added two wavefunctions corresponding to 2 stationary states and now judge what it came out of this addition.

Daniel.
 
I mean adding pi or pi/2 to that fraction with h's and a's isn't going to give anything special.
 
I'd say that u've gotten yourself a nostationary state...I don't see other effect...

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K