Identity Theft: ChoicePoint Case Reaches 500K Potentially Vulnerable

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of identity theft related to the ChoicePoint case, where a significant number of individuals may have had their personal information compromised. Participants explore concerns about data privacy, the reliability of data protection measures, and the broader implications of identity management in the digital age.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express deep concerns about the security of personal information online, with one individual stating they refuse to share any personal data on the internet due to distrust in data protection systems.
  • There is a suggestion that government assurances regarding data privacy are not trustworthy, with a participant noting the potential for data to be correlated and misused.
  • One participant raises a question about the abuse of identification numbers, comparing the Brazilian CPF to the US Social Security number and inquiring about the extent of its misuse.
  • Another participant comments on the common practice of companies exchanging personal data, indicating a level of acceptance of data processing but expressing discomfort with human access to that data.
  • A later reply dismisses the value of the Social Security number, implying that its importance may diminish in the future.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express concerns about data privacy and the potential for misuse of personal information, but there is no consensus on the best methods for protecting oneself or the implications of these practices.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss various perspectives on data privacy without resolving the complexities of identity management and the effectiveness of current protections. The conversation reflects a range of personal experiences and opinions regarding the handling of personal data.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,617
Reaction score
7,634
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050219/ap_on_bi_ge/choicepoint_identity_theft_12

By RACHEL KONRAD, AP Business Writer

SAN FRANCISCO - At least 700 people had their identities stolen during a yearlong scam by con artists who had signed up as clients of data-broker ChoicePoint Inc., the Los Angeles task force in charge of the criminal investigation confirmed on Friday.

When word first emerged this week that still unknown scammers had illegally obtained detailed dossiers on 35,000 people by posing as legitimate customers of ChoicePoint, the company portrayed it as a relatively minor criminal case, limited to California.

But by week's end, it was shaping up to be a full-blown scandal with as many as a half million people nationwide potentially vulnerable to identity theft.

Outraged, attorneys general from 38 states demanded that ChoicePoint warn any victims in their states as well, and politicians, consumer advocates and security experts called for more federal oversight of a lightly regulated industry that gathers and sells personal data about nearly every adult American.

The task force leader, sheriff's lieutenant Robert Costa, said the number of people vulnerable to identity theft in the case could reach 500,000.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Computer science news on Phys.org
Well, I've been around the computer industry since 1979 as an engineer and perhaps I am paranoid (most likely) but I refuse to put any information about myself on the internet, nada, zip, zilch, zero.

If I google myself (still sounds obcene as a verb) I find nothing and that is just the way I like it. I keep no passwords on my PC, no credit card numbers as I simply do not trust MS's now defunct Password holder system.
Although the governments of the world and even individual companies all say that they do not share data with anyone, we who know, know this is a lie. Once the data start becoming corelated with other data, the genie is out of the bottle.
As an non american, (I am an Australian residing permanantly in Brasil) I do not have a SS number, but I have the equivalent here in Brasil, called a CPF which would translate to "Registered Physical Person" number which stays with me forever and is needed for nearly everything you do.
But according to the government this number is only needed for official government transactions.
But the harsh reality is that I cannot even get a subscription to a local newspaper without giving them this number.
Is the US Social Security system number abused in the same way??
Who do we complain to. After a while these numbers become a defacto HBIN (Human Being Identification Number...my own Acronym)
How do we protect ourselves from this abuse of our personalaties?
Stop using Credit Cards, only cash? I don't know the answer, only that the future in this respect scares me. As a Computer Engineer, I both love and hate technology. The advantages are obvious, but the downsides are terrifying.
 
Doesn't sound like something unfamiliar! It is commonplace that 'associated' companies exchange databases of personal data.
Personally I don't care if my data stays in a database and is processed by machines, but when humans have a look at it then it sounds more like a violation of privacy...
 
Mentioned two posts above was Social Security.

All I have to say to you is that you won't be missing out on not having that soon.