Electric Potential: Solving for Distance d from Origin

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential V at a distance d from the origin due to a rod of length L with a nonuniform charge density represented as &x. The derived formula is V = k&[L + dln(1 + d/L)], which differs from the book's answer of V = k&[L - dln(1 + L/d)]. The discrepancy arises from a misunderstanding of logarithmic properties, specifically the relationship between dln(1 + d/L) and -dln(1 + L/d). The user is advised to carefully review the logarithmic transformations applied during the integration process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and charge density concepts
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of logarithmic properties and transformations
  • Basic physics principles related to electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of logarithms in mathematical transformations
  • Study integration techniques for nonuniform charge distributions
  • Learn about electric potential calculations in electrostatics
  • Explore examples of electric potential involving varying charge densities
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying electrostatics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to electric potential and charge distributions.

funkwort
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
A rod of length L lies along the x-axis with its left end at the origin and has a nonuniform charge density @ = &x. What is the electic potential a distance d from the origin?

V = k int dQ/x where:

dQ = &x dx so:

V = k& int (x/x+d)dx from (0 to L)
I let u = x+d and x = u-d
so:
V = k& int (1 - d/u)du = (x+d) - dln(x+d) (0 to L)
and I get: V = k&[L + dln(1 + d/L)]

in the book the answer is: k&[L - dln(1 + L/d)]

what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
look very carefully:

+ dln(1 + d/L) [your solution] = - dln(1 + L/d) [book's solution]

by the properties of logarithms.
 
I know the properties of logarithms, but look:

(x+d) - dln(x+d) from (0 to L)

[(L+d) - dln(L+d)] - [d - dln(d)] = [L - dln(L+d) + dln(d)] = L + dln(d/L+d): so somewhere I must be making a mistake with the signs, but where?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
802
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K