HELP Rotational equilibrium material

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concepts of rotational equilibrium and dynamics, specifically the equations T=I*alpha, L=I*omega, and W=T*theta. A practical example involving a 700.0N window washer and a 200.0N scaffold is analyzed to determine the forces in the supporting ropes. The correct approach involves calculating torques around a reference point to ensure the system remains in equilibrium, leading to the conclusion that the forces in the ropes differ due to the window washer's position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rotational dynamics and equilibrium concepts
  • Familiarity with torque calculations and reference points
  • Knowledge of basic physics equations related to forces and motion
  • Ability to solve linear equations and manipulate algebraic expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and its application in rotational systems
  • Learn about static equilibrium conditions in physics
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple forces and torques
  • Explore the concept of center of mass and its relevance in equilibrium problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and rotational dynamics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of equilibrium and torque calculations.

misskitty
Messages
745
Reaction score
0
HELP! Rotational equilibrium material!

HELP!---Okay, I am having some issues grasping the concepts of rotational equilibrium and dynamics. Specifically the equations:

T=I*alpha
L=I*omega
T*delta t= delta L
W=T*theta
P=T* omega

And there are also problems that I can't understand so I don't really know where to begin or if I'm doing them correctly. Heres an example:

A 700.0N window washer is standing on a uniform scffold supported by a vertical rope at each end. The scaffold weighs 200.0N and is 3.00m long. What is the force in each rope when the window washer stands 1.00m from one end?

This is what I've got for work:

L=3.00m
Theta=90 degrees
d=1.00m
Force of window washer (Fw)= 700.0N
Force os scaffolding (Fs)= 200.0N
Force of the ropes=Ft

T=Ft*L - Fw*(L/2) - Fs*d
T=Ft*3 - 200*(3/2) - 700*1
T=3Ft - 300 - 700
-3Ft= -300-700
-3Ft/-3= -1000/-3
Ft = 3.33*10^2N

I have no idea if any of it is right...I tried to follow th example in the book and that was as far as I got. There are a ton of similar problems in the book and on my test. If someone could please help... :cry: thank

Sidenote: This is my first Forum post so if the math and such is dificult to understand I'm sorry.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem asked "what is the force in each rope". The whole point is that since the window washer is not standing in the center of the scaffold, the force on the two ropes is NOT the same.

For simplicity, let's say the window washer is 1 meter from the LEFT end rope and, so, 2 meters from the RIGHT end rope. Call the force on the rope on the left side FL and the force on the rope on the right side FR.

The scaffold weighs 200 N and the window washer weighs 700 N so there is a total force downward of 900 N. Since the window washer and scaffold are NOT going down (that's the point of "equilibrium") the force upward, FL+ FR= 900.

Now choose any point as a "reference" point and calculate the total 'torque' around that point- since the scaffold is NOT rotating, that must be 0 (that's the "rotational equilibrium"- it's NOT rotating!). There are four points that are of interest: the left end where the force is FL, the place where the window washer is standing, 1 m away where the force is -700 N, the center of the scaffold where the force is -200 N (since the scaffold is uniform, we can take the force at its center) 1.5 m away from the left end, and the right end, 3 m from the left end, where the force is +FR. Since the torque due to each force is the force times the distance from the reference point, taking the reference point to be one of those, means the distance will be 0 and we will have one less term to worry about.

For example, taking the left end as reference point, and taking "upward" as positive, the total torque is FL(0)-700(1)- 200(1.5)+ FR(3)= 0. That's easy to solve for FR. Once you know that you can use FL+ FR= 900 to solve for FL.
 
I think I think I understand how to do it...but where did the 1.5 come from...FL(0)-700(1)- 200(1.5)+ FR(3)= 0? I just want to make sure that I have this right so I can practice some more problems, take the test and only study one portion of physics instead of this and what my class is doing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K