Systems of equations - consistency

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the conditions for consistency in systems of equations, specifically focusing on two systems involving three variables. Participants explore the implications of their findings and the nature of solutions, including the introduction of parameters and dependencies among variables.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that for the first system, the condition for consistency is that c + 2a - b = 0.
  • Another participant notes that for the second system, the expression for z indicates that a, b, and c can be chosen arbitrarily, implying they are not dependent on each other.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about whether they can substitute specific values for a, b, and c to find a solution for the second system.
  • Responses indicate that substituting values for a, b, and c is valid and would yield one of many possible solutions.
  • There is a mention of the complexity of the solutions derived from the second system, which some participants find concerning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the condition for consistency in the first system but express differing views on the implications of the second system, particularly regarding the independence of a, b, and c. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the perceived complexity of the solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully explored the implications of the solutions or the conditions under which the systems are consistent, leading to some uncertainty about the relationships among a, b, and c.

Who May Find This Useful

Students studying systems of equations, particularly in the context of linear algebra or related mathematical fields, may find this discussion relevant.

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hello, could someone please help me out with the following questions?

Q. Determine the conditions on a, b, c so that the following systems are consistent and find any solutions.

a)
[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> x + 2y - 3z = a \\ <br /> 3x - y + 2z = b \\ <br /> x - 5y + 8z = c \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]

b)
[tex] \begin{array}{l}<br /> x + 2y + 4z = a \\ <br /> 2x + 3y - z = b \\ <br /> 3x + y + 2z = c \\ <br /> \end{array}[/tex]



Firstly, the 'solutions' that I end up getting seem to either require me to introduce a parameter(for the first system) for one of the variables or the answer is in terms of a, b and c(for the seond systrem).

I am really unsure about how to do this question. For part a I wrote the corresponding augmented matrix and got down to what I think is it's reduced echelon form.

[tex] \left( {\left| {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> 1 & 2 & { - 3} \\<br /> 0 & { - 7} & {11} \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> \end{array}} \right|\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> a \\<br /> {b - 3a} \\<br /> {c + 2a - b} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right)[/tex]

So the condition need for the system to be consistent that c+2a-b = 0 right? I'm not sure what else needs to be said to determine the conditions for a, b and c so that the system is consistent. Also, when I solved the equation I let z = s where s is a real number so that I got:

[tex] \left( {x,y,z} \right) = \left( {\frac{{5a + 2c + s}}{7},\frac{{11s + a - c}}{7},s} \right)[/tex]


For part b I went further so as to reduce the augmented matrix to row reduced echelon form:

[tex] \left( {\left| {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 1 & 0 \\<br /> 0 & 0 & 1 \\<br /> \end{array}} \right|\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {\frac{{140b - 259a - 14c}}{{35}}} \\<br /> {\frac{{133a - 80b + 9c}}{{35}}} \\<br /> {\frac{{7a - 5b + c}}{{35}}} \\<br /> \end{array}} \right)[/tex]

Now the 'problem' with this is that none of the rows in the coefficient matrix are zero. So no matter what I try to do with the overall augmented matrix, it seems that the system is always consistent. Can this possibly be right? Also, from the augmented matrix the 'solution' to the system would be:

[tex] \left( {x,y,z} \right) = \left( {\frac{{140b - 259a - 14c}}{{35}},\frac{{133a - 80b + 9c}}{{35}},\frac{{7a - 5b + c}}{{35}}} \right)[/tex]

Now that just looks way too complicated to be correct. Can someone please help me out with this question? Any help would be great thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I had similar homework and it is already graded :-p
For (a) it is sufficient to say that condition is c+2a-b = 0.
For (b) you have this: z = (7a - 5b + c)/35. And if you think about it, it shows that there a, b, c can be chosen arbitrarily, i.e. they can be any number, so a, b, c are not dependent on each other, unlike (a), where you can say that b = c + 2a and so forth, where each variable is dependent on other two.
 
Last edited:
Heh, I thought that homework exercises(mine is from an exercise booklet) wouldn't involve that much work.

I know that the following is a rather stupid question but I'd just like to make sure. For (b) as an example could I write something like let a = 2, b = -1, c = 4 and plug the values into back into (x,y,z) to get one solution? Anyway thanks for the help. Out of curiosity are you from Melbourne, Australia? :D
 
Last edited:
could I write something like let a = 2, b = -1, c = 4 and plug the values into back into (x,y,z) to get one solution?
Yeah, that would be one of many solutions.
Out of curiosity are you from Melbourne, Australia?
Nope, quite far from it actually :smile: , right now I am going to school in US.
Our exercises come from Penney's textbook, who is a professor in our math department.
 
Oh ok. Some of the questions from my booklet might have been taken from that textbook.
 
interesting that a criterion for correctness was assumed to be lack of work involved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K