Simplifying Transmission Coefficient Calculation for a Potential Barrier

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nylex
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving the calculation of the transmission coefficient T for a potential barrier defined from x = 0 to x = a. The original poster presents a complex expression for A, which is related to the transmission coefficient, and seeks assistance in simplifying it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the simplification of a complex expression involving exponential and hyperbolic functions. There are attempts to rewrite the expression in a more manageable form, and questions are raised about the necessity of taking the square modulus of the expression.

Discussion Status

Several participants have engaged in rewriting the expression and exploring its components. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, and while some progress has been made in simplifying the expression, there is no explicit consensus on the final form or approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need to consider the square modulus of the expression for the transmission coefficient and discuss the implications of the parameters involved, such as k_1 and k_2, without resolving the overall simplification challenge.

Nylex
Messages
552
Reaction score
2
Hi, I've been doing a QM problem to do with a potential barrier going from x = 0 to x = a. I need to work out an expression for the transmission coefficient T and have a horrible looking expression:

I can't use LaTeX properly, so:

A = (F/4k_{1}k_{2}).e^ik_{1}a[e^-k_{2}a (k_{2} + ik_{1})(k_{1} - ik_{2}) + e^k_{2}a (k_{2} - ik_{1})(k_{1} + ik_{2})]

where k_{1} = (1/hbar)(2mE)^1/2, k_{2} = (1/hbar)[2m(V_{0} - E)]^1/2

How on Earth do I simplify this further? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this what u meant...?
[tex]A = (F/4k_{1}k_{2})\cdot e^{ik_{1}a}[e^{-k_{2}a} (k_{2} + ik_{1})(k_{1} - ik_{2}) + e^{k_{2}a} (k_{2} - ik_{1})(k_{1} + ik_{2})][/tex]

,where [tex]k_{1} = (1/\hbar)(2mE)^{1/2}, k_{2} = (1/\hbar)[2m(V_{0} - E)]^{1/2}[/tex]

Daniel.

P.S.Won't u be needing the square modulus of this expression?
 
Last edited:
Yikes. I've done this problem before. I know it's not pretty.

Anyway, if you work out the brackets:
[tex]e^{-k_2a}(k_{2} + ik_{1})(k_{1} - ik_{2})[/tex]
and
[tex]e^{k_2a}(k_{2} - ik_{1})(k_{1} + ik_{2})][/tex]
you can rewrite the sum as:

[tex]2k_1k_2\left(e^{k_2a}+e^{-k_2a}\right)+i(k_2^2-k_1^2)(e^{k_2a}-e^{k_2a})[/tex]
The exponential combinations form hyperbolic sinusoids. The expression is equal to:
[tex]4k_1k_2\cosh(k_2a)+2i(k_2^2-k_1^2)\sinh(k_2a)[/tex]

So the original expression becomes (divide both sides by F, since you're interested in T=|F/A|^2, right?):

[tex]\frac{A}{F}=e^{ik_1a}\left(\cosh(k_2a)-\frac{i}{2}\left(\frac{k_2^2-k_1^2}{k_1k_2}\right)\sinh(k_2a)\right)[/tex]

Take the modulus squared on both sides (the term in brackets is in the form a+bi with a and b real, so it's simply a^2+b^2):

[tex]T^{-1}=\frac{|A|^2}{|F|^2}=\cosh^2(k_2a)+\frac{1}{4}\left(\frac{k_2^2-k_1^2}{k_1k_2}\right)^2\sinh^2(k_2a)[/tex]

Now use the expressions for [itex]k_1, k_2[/itex] to show that:

[tex]\left(\frac{k_2^2-k_1^2}{k_1k_2}\right)^2=-4+\frac{V_0^2}{E(V_0-E)}[/tex]

Use the identity [itex]cosh^2(x)-sinh^2(x)=1[/itex] and write out [itex]k_2[/itex] in the argument to get the final answer.
..whew
 
Last edited:
Ahh, cheers both of you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K