Parabolic Problems: Weak Formulation & Solution Verification

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Feynman
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the weak formulation and solution verification of a parabolic problem defined by the equation \(\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}-\Delta u= f_{0}\) over the domain \(\Omega_{T}=\Omega\times ]0,T[\). The weak formulation requires proving that the operator \(a(u,v)\) is coercive and that the term \(f_0\) belongs to the dual space \(H^{-1}(\Omega)\), ensuring the existence and uniqueness of the solution in the space \(L^2(0,T;H^1(\Omega))\). Additionally, it is necessary to demonstrate that the solution \(u\) satisfies the initial and boundary conditions, specifically \(u(.,0)=u_0\) and \(\frac{\partial u}{\partial n}=f_1\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of weak formulations in partial differential equations
  • Knowledge of Sobolev spaces, particularly \(H^1(\Omega)\) and \(H^{-1}(\Omega)\)
  • Familiarity with coercivity of operators in functional analysis
  • Proficiency in distribution theory and test functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Sobolev spaces, focusing on \(H^1\) and \(H^{-1}\)
  • Learn about coercive operators and their role in proving existence and uniqueness of solutions
  • Explore the concept of weak derivatives and their applications in distribution theory
  • Investigate the techniques for verifying boundary and initial conditions in weak formulations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, applied mathematicians, and engineers involved in solving parabolic partial differential equations, particularly those interested in weak formulations and functional analysis.

Feynman
Messages
152
Reaction score
0
Let the parabolic problem:
[tex]\displaystyle\left\{<br /> \newline\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \newline\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}-\Delta u= f_{0}& \Omega_{T}=\Omega\times ]0,T[\\ <br /> \newline\frac{\partial{u}}{\partial n}=f_{1}& \Gamma_{T}=\partial\Omega\times ]0,T[ \\ <br /> \newline u(.,0)=u_{0}& \Omega \end{array}\right.[/tex]

Then the weak formulation of this problem is :[tex] \displaystyle\left\{<br /> \newline\begin{array}{ccc}<br /> \newline Trouver & u\in L^{2}(0,T;H^{1}(\Omega))\cap C(0,T;L^{2}(\Omega))\\ <br /> \newline\int_{0}^{T}[a(u(t),v)\phi(t)-(u(t),v)\phi^{,}(t)]dt=(u_{0},v)\phi(0) +\int_{0}^{T}(f_{0}(t),v)\phi(t) dt\\ <br /> \newline + \int_{0}^{T}<f_{1}(t),v>_{H^{-\frac{1}{2}},H^{\frac{1}{2}}}\phi(t)dt&\forall\phi\inD([0,T[)et\forallv\in H^{1}(\Omega)\end{array}\right.<br /> and \displaystyle (h,g)= \int_{Omega} h(x)g(x) dx and $\displaystyle a(u,v)=(\nabla u,\nabla v).[/tex]
So how prof that this weak problem have a solution? and u verify .[tex](1)_{1} and (1)_{3}.[/tex]
u verify .[tex](1)_{3}.[/tex]?
Merci
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so? i need help
 
pour votre question. Pour prouver que ce problème faible a une solution, il faut montrer que l'opérateur $a(u,v)$ est coercif et que le terme $f_0$ est dans l'espace dual de $H^{-1}(\Omega)$. Cela garantira l'existence et l'unicité de la solution dans l'espace $L^2(0,T;H^1(\Omega))$.

Pour prouver que $u$ vérifie les conditions (1)$_1$ et (1)$_3$, il faut montrer que $u(.,0)=u_0$ et $\frac{\partial u}{\partial n}=f_1$. Cela peut être fait en utilisant les propriétés des espaces fonctionnels et en montrant que ces conditions sont satisfaites par la solution trouvée dans l'espace $L^2(0,T;H^1(\Omega))$.

Enfin, pour vérifier que $u$ vérifie la condition (1)$_3$, il faut montrer que $\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}-\Delta u=f_0$ dans le sens des distributions. Cela peut être fait en utilisant la définition de la dérivée dans le sens des distributions et en montrant que l'équation est satisfaite pour toute fonction test $\phi \in D([0,T[)$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K