Summand part in summation notation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing series in summation notation, specifically focusing on the series of odd and even numbers. Participants are examining the correct formulation of summands and the limits of summation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to identify the correct summands for the series 1+3+5+7+9+11 and 4+6+8+10+12+14+16+18. Questions arise regarding the notation and the limits of summation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct summation notation, with some participants providing interpretations and others questioning the accuracy of the proposed summands and limits. Multiple perspectives on the notation are being discussed without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential misunderstandings about the starting and ending points of the series, as well as the implications of the summation limits in relation to the series terms.

aisha
Messages
584
Reaction score
0
I need to write the following series in summation notation

1) 1+3+5+7+9+11 SUMMAND (2k-1)? is this right?

2) 4+6+8+10+12+12+16+18 (2k+2)? is this right?

Have I got it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay.What does these symbols mean
[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n} k[/tex] ?

Daniel.
 
[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{n} k[/tex]

ok the n= the last number in the series

k=1 the one is the first number in the series

k is the summand its used to get the terms in the series u input number k through n to get the series
 
ok for the first series i posted i got the summand to be (2k-1) with a 6 over the sigma and for the second series I got (2k+2) as the summand with 18 over the sigma, is this correct?
 
Perfect,then u agree it means just:1+2+...+k+...+n ...?

Okay.Now imagine how would your first sum would look like...You already did...Great.

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{5} (2k+1)[/tex]

Agree...?

Daniel.

P.S.For some reason,we prefer the "+" for the general form of an odd #.
 
Nope,not really.U see,the last term must coincide with the value of the general term when evaluated with the superior value:
[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{5} (2k+1)=...+11[/tex]

[tex]11=(2k+1)|_{k=5}[/tex]...

Okay...?

Daniel.
 
[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{5} (2k+1)[/tex]

ok so this is the only answer for the first series?

[tex]\sum_{k=4}^{18} (2k+2)[/tex] and is this answer correct for the second series?
 
Okay,true.Have your way,it's basically the same thing...:wink:

Daniel.
 
aisha said:
[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{5} (2k+1)[/tex]

ok so this is the only answer for the first series?

[tex]\sum_{k=4}^{18} (2k+2)[/tex] and is this answer correct for the second series?

No,no,as i just said,your answer is true as well.Just for the first.For the second,the "k" should go from 1------>8.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
show me how the second one looks I don't understand from 2-8?
 
  • #11
[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{8}(2k+2)[/tex] produces the same terms as the ones you had.

Daniel.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
how come 2 and 8 are right the series didnt start with 2 or end at 8
 
  • #13
It's "+1" --------->"+8".It was a tiny mistake.I've edited my posts.

[tex](2k+2)|_{k=1}=2\times 1+2=4[/tex]
-----------------
[tex](2k+2)|_{k=8}=2\times 8+2=18[/tex]

Okay?

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
893
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
874
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K