Is the Square Root of 2 Irrational?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathwonk
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the rationality of the square root of 2, exploring various proofs and arguments regarding its irrationality. Participants share different approaches and proofs, some of which extend to general cases involving non-square numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a proof that if sqrt(2) = p/q in lowest terms, then p^2 = 2 and q^2 = 1, leading to the conclusion that sqrt(2) is not rational.
  • Another participant mentions familiarity with this proof since sixth grade and considers it nicer than the prime factorization approach.
  • A different proof is suggested that applies to all non-square numbers, involving the counting of prime factors on both sides of the equation.
  • Some participants express a preference for simpler proofs that use fewer mathematical tools, while others argue that fractions are necessary in discussions of rational numbers.
  • A participant questions whether the first proof could also apply to all non-squares, suggesting that if p/q = sqrt(n) is in lowest terms, then p^2 = n implies n is a perfect square.
  • Another participant clarifies that while p^2 = n, it also follows that q^2 = 1 in the context of the proofs discussed.
  • One participant raises a question about proving the irrationality of the nth root of 2 for integers n greater than or equal to 2.
  • A suggestion is made to apply similar techniques used in the discussion to prove the irrationality of the nth root of 2.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the proofs presented, with no clear consensus on which proof is superior or more understandable. Multiple competing views on the use of fractions and the complexity of proofs remain evident throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some proofs rely on the uniqueness of factorization into primes, and the discussion includes varying levels of understanding and acceptance of different mathematical techniques. The applicability of certain proofs to non-square numbers is also debated.

mathwonk
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
12,000
Reaction score
2,307
Have you seen this argument? If sqrt(2) = p/q is in lowest terms, then also 2/1 = p^2/q^2 is in lowest terms. Since lowest terms is unique, p^2 = 2 and q^2 = 1. Thus sqrt(2) is the integer p. But 1^2 is too small, 2^2 is too big and all the resta re even bigger, so this is false. So sqrt(2) is not rational.

does anyone have a shorter one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope.I've known this proof from 6-th grade.Learnt it in school.It's much nicer (though roughly equivalent) than the one with prime factors...

Daniel.
 
boy you had a good 6th grade teacher!
 
A better proof, perhaps, and one that works for all non-squares.

let sqrt(x) = p/q, then xq^2=p^2, counting primes with multiplicity, unless x is a perfect square there will be an odd number of prime factors of the left hand side and an even number of the right handside
 
thats a nice proof, but when i first saw that as a student i didn't understand it, so i came up with the one above as using fewer tools, or at least apparently so.

moreover, doesn't the first proof above also work on all non squares? I.e. if p/q = sqrt(n) is in lowest terms, then so also is p^2/q^2 = n/1, so p^2 = n, and hence n is a perfect square.

of course both proofs rest on exactly the same fact, uniqueness of factorization into primes.
 
I just don't like using fractions unnecessarily.
 
chaque a son gout. but you do not mind using prime factorization.

To me it seems rather hard to avoid fractions in discussing rational numbers, but i agree the correct first step in a problem involving fractions is normally to remove them.
 
Last edited:
This may be the same argument as you're using, don't know really. Assume that sqrt(2) is rational, then we have p and q such as sqrt(2) = p/q. This gived 2 = p^2/q^2. But since gcd(p,q)=1 then p^2/q^2 isn't an integer unless q=1. This gives the equation 2 = p^2 with integers, no integer can solve this equation, and hence sqrt(2) cannot be rational.
 
mathwonk said:
thats a nice proof, but when i first saw that as a student i didn't understand it, so i came up with the one above as using fewer tools, or at least apparently so.

moreover, doesn't the first proof above also work on all non squares? I.e. if p/q = sqrt(n) is in lowest terms, then so also is p^2/q^2 = n/1, so p^2 = n, and hence n is a perfect square.

of course both proofs rest on exactly the same fact, uniqueness of factorization into primes.

would it not be:

p^2 = nq^2

?
 
  • #10
well if p^2 /q^2 = n/1, and the left side is known to be in lowest terms, and if the lowest terms form of a fraction is unique, then since the right side n/1 is obviously also in lowest terms, then the two fractions must be equal, i.e;. they must have the same top and same bottom.

Since the tops are equal, p^2 = n.

so of course you are right, that p^2 = nq^2, but in fact also q^2 = 1.
 
  • #11
I've heard that the nth root of 2 (n an integer, greater than or equal to 2) is irrational. How would one prove that?
 
  • #12
Have you tried applying the same technique?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K