Geometry of Sphere: Find All Points on Circle in Sphere

  • Thread starter Thread starter kevinalm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Sphere
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the geometric relationship between a circle and a sphere. Participants explore the conditions under which all points of a circle, defined by its radius and distance from a point P, lie within a sphere centered at P. The mathematical implications of this relationship are examined, particularly in the context of kinematics and geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the geometric setup involving a circle and a sphere, questioning the implications of the distances involved. Some explore the relationship through kinematic equations and geometric reasoning, while others reflect on the nature of the surface of revolution generated by the circle.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their perspectives and confirming their understanding of the geometric relationships. Some have offered insights into the implications of their findings, while others express initial confusion about the terminology used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the values of R and r must be non-negative, and they discuss specific cases where these values are zero, leading to different geometric interpretations. There is an acknowledgment of the intuitive challenges presented by the problem setup.

kevinalm
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
Subject wise, this seems the most appropriate forum, so I'll post here. Feel free to move.

Given a circle of radius r, whose center is distance R from point P and which always lies in a plane perpendicular to line defined by P and center of circle (r) at distance R. All points of the circle will always lie within the surface of a sphere centered on P of radius= sqr( r^2 +R^2). I'm pretty confident on my result but intuitively I didn't expect this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kevinalm said:
Subject wise, this seems the most appropriate forum, so I'll post here. Feel free to move.

Given a circle of radius r, whose center is distance R from point P and which always lies in a plane perpendicular to line defined by P and center of circle (r) at distance R. All points of the circle will always lie within the surface of a sphere centered on P of radius= sqr( r^2 +R^2). I'm pretty confident on my result but intuitively I didn't expect this.
I am a little confused by your terms, but I think this is equivalent to slicing a sphere at a distance R from the centre. This generates a circular cross section and the points on the circumference of that circular cross section are all on the surface of the sphere.

AM
 
Yes, that is what I'm doing. I just came at it from a strange viewpoint. I was setting up some kinematic equations for a gyro rim, the axel of which is constrained to pass through point P, and the center of which is constrained to distance R from P. What surprised me was that for all r,R >0 all points of the gyro rim (idealized to a circle of course) lie within a sphere. On reflection, I see this is to be expected. Thanks.
 
Take any of the points, X, on the circle and draw the line from the center of the circle, O, to X, the line from O to P, and the line from X to P. Since the circle is in a plane perpendicular to OP, those three line segments form a right triangle. The distance from X to O is r and the distance from O to P is R. Use the Pythagorean to find the distance from X to P.
 
Yes, that was my original solution, in essence. I was looking at the "axel" rotating in the xy plane and was curious as to the nature of the surface of revolution. What I wasn't expecting was that for all non-negative R,r all points of circle (r) lie in a single sphere of radius= sqr(r^2 +R^2) . It even fails sensibly in the cases R=0, r=0 and R,r=0,0 collapsing to sphere radius r, sphere radius R and point P respectively. For some silly reason I was thinking of varying oblateness, depending on R,r. Didn't want to believe myself. Leads to some interesting implications I may explore, like the instantaneous v always in the tangent plane.(to the sphere at that point.)

Again Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K