Calculating Normalization Constant for Wavefunction

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sarabellum02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Normalization
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the normalization constant for a specific wavefunction in quantum mechanics, particularly one expressed in spherical coordinates. Participants also explore the explicit form of the harmonic oscillator wavefunction for a given quantum number and the implications of dimensionality in these calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks how to calculate the normalization constant for a wavefunction of the form (r/a)e^(-r/2a) sin(theta)e^(i*phi).
  • Another participant states that the probability of finding a particle in all space must equal one, leading to the integral condition for normalization.
  • A third participant corrects the integral setup, indicating that it should be in three-dimensional spherical coordinates, providing the appropriate limits for the integral.
  • One participant acknowledges a previous error regarding the dimensionality of the wavefunction and agrees with the correction made by another participant.
  • Another participant argues that the original statement about the 1D case was correct, asserting that wavefunctions can be treated as scalars in that context.
  • A participant reiterates the request for the explicit form of the harmonic oscillator wavefunction for quantum number 8 and questions the dimensionality of the oscillator, noting that notation conventions can vary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no clear consensus on the normalization process, as participants present differing views on the dimensionality of the wavefunction and the correctness of earlier statements. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the explicit form of the harmonic oscillator wavefunction and the implications of dimensionality.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about notation conventions and the dimensionality of the harmonic oscillator, which may affect the interpretation of the wavefunctions discussed.

sarabellum02
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How do I calculate the normalization constant for a wavefunction of the form (r/a)e^(-r/2a) sin(theta)e^(i*phi)?

How would I write the explict harmonic oscillator wavefunction for quantum number 8(in terms on pi, alpha, and y)

thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that the probability of the particle existing somewhere in all space is certain. So we have

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi\left(x\right)\psi^*\left(x\right)dx=1[/tex].

For the case of the wavefunction you have been given, an exact anti-derivative exists with these particular limits.

EDIT: Now correct for the 1D case. See jtbell's post for the correct answer.
 
Last edited:
No, this is a three-dimensional wave function in spherical coordinates, so the integral looks like this:

[tex]\int_0^{2 \pi} {\int_0^{\pi} {\int_0^{\infty}{\psi^*(r, \theta, \phi) \psi(r, \theta, \phi)} r^2 \sin \theta \ dr} \ d\theta} \ d\phi} = 1[/tex]
 
Yes, of course, jtbell is correct. Sorry. What I wrote was wrong even in the 1D case.
 
It was correct in the ID case,those wave functions are scalars (bosonic variables) and can be switched places inside the integral.


Daniel.
 
sarabellum02 said:
How would I write the explict harmonic oscillator wavefunction for quantum number 8(in terms on pi, alpha, and y)

thanx

How many dimensions does this oscillator have...?It's essential to know this fact.As for the variables you posted,they couldn't ring a bell,because notation conventions are not unique... :wink:

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K