Proving Isomorphism between Vector Space and Polynomial Space

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eckiller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the isomorphism between the vector space V of finite sequences over a field F and the polynomial space W = P(F). The transformation T: V --> W is defined as T(s) = sum(s(i)*x^i, 0, n), where n is the largest integer such that s(n) is non-zero. The participants clarify that T is onto by demonstrating that any polynomial can be represented as a finite sequence, thus establishing that T is invertible and confirming the isomorphism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with polynomial functions and their definitions
  • Knowledge of field theory, specifically regarding finite sequences
  • Concept of isomorphism in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces and their isomorphisms
  • Explore polynomial algebra and its applications in linear transformations
  • Learn about finite fields and their implications in vector space theory
  • Investigate the concept of invertible transformations in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the relationship between vector spaces and polynomial functions.

eckiller
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Let V denote the vector space that consists of all sequences {a_n} in F (field) that have only a finite number of nonzero terms a_n. Let W = P(F) (all polynomials with coefficients from field F). Define,

T: V --> W by T(s) = sum(s(i)*x^i, 0, n)

where n is the largest integer s.t. s(n) != 0. Prive that T is an isomorphism.


I see how the transformation is mapping sequences to polynomials, but I don't even see how this is onto. Based on the sequence description, there comes a time where the remaining terms of every sequence is 0:

s_n = (s1, s2, ..., sn, 0, 0, ...).

So I don't see how that will "hit" every polynomial since the polynomials given in the problem don't have the "zero after finite many terms" restriction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gosh this is so obvious, what to say?

you are just blocked from seeing it by some late night demon.

Recall, what is the definition of a polynomial?


In particular, what is the degree of a polynomial?

or just try to produce ontoness directly by actually writing down say,

the finite sequence that maps to the polynomial 5x^7 - x^6 +459x - 2.

then ask yourself what prevents you from doing this for any polynomial.
 
Last edited:
Is this right?

For any p in P(F), p = c0 + c1 x + ... + ck x^k

Then define T2 : W --> V by T2( c0 + c1 x + ... + ck x^k ) = (c0, c1, ...,
ck, 0, 0, ...).

Then,

T2( T( (s0, s1, ..., sn, 0, 0, ...) ) )
= T2( s0 + s1 x + ... + sn x^n )
= (s0, s1, ..., sn, 0, 0, ...)

and,

T( T2( s0 + s1 x + ... + sn x^n ) )
= T( (s0, s1, ..., sn, 0, 0, ...) )
= s0 + s1 x + ... + sn x^n

which implies T is invertible, and hence an isomorphism?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K