What is the minimum radius for a safe and effective space station?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to the design of a future space station that utilizes rotational force to simulate gravity. The goal is to determine the minimum radius required for the station to ensure that the centripetal acceleration at the outer rim matches Earth's gravity while maintaining a safe difference in acceleration between the head and feet of astronauts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between centripetal acceleration and radius, with some suggesting the use of equations to relate the accelerations at different heights. Others raise questions about the assumptions made regarding human tolerance to acceleration differences.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their calculations and reasoning, with multiple interpretations of the problem being explored. Some have arrived at the same numerical answer for the minimum radius, while others are discussing the methods used to reach that conclusion. There is a collaborative effort to clarify the problem without reaching a definitive consensus on the approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the constraints of the problem, such as the requirement for the centripetal acceleration to equal approximately 1g and the specific tolerance level of 1/100 g between the head and feet of astronauts. The average height of humans is also considered in the calculations.

LHS Students
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Junior level Physics problem I am having trouble with:

Some plans for a future space station make use of a rotational force to simulate gravity. In order to be effective the centripetal acceleration at the outer rim of the station should equal about 1g, or 98.1 m/s^2. However humans can withstand a difference of only 1/100 g between their head and feet. Assume average human height is 2 m and calculate the minimum radius for a safe effective station. (Hint: The ratio of the centripetal acceleration of astronauts feet to the centripetal acceleration of the astronauts head must be at least 99/100.)

My whole class is having trouble with this problem all help appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please Help! :cry:
 
When af (a at your feet) =1.00*g = v^2/r
then ah = 0.99*g =v^2/(r-2)

so ah/af = 0.99 =(v^2/(r-2)) / v^2/r
 
Use a centripetal acceleration* equation to find the force of a large spinning circle, and one with a radius two meters smaller. That will give you two related equations.

Then set them proportionally equal to each other (ie, 99a = 100b ). Solve for your unknowns.

*edit: acceleration, not force :)

PS, if you know the answer, post it here. I want to know if I got it right :) It's a nice problem.
 
Last edited:
LHS Students said:
Junior level Physics problem I am having trouble with:

Some plans for a future space station make use of a rotational force to simulate gravity. In order to be effective the centripetal acceleration at the outer rim of the station should equal about 1g, or 98.1 m/s^2. However humans can withstand a difference of only 1/100 g between their head and feet. Assume average human height is 2 m and calculate the minimum radius for a safe effective station. (Hint: The ratio of the centripetal acceleration of astronauts feet to the centripetal acceleration of the astronauts head must be at least 99/100.)

My whole class is having trouble with this problem all help appreciated.
The Centripetal Acceleration of an object moving with Velocity "V" in a circle of Radius "r" is given by {V2/r}. Thus, for the spinning Space Station with an Outer Radius "r", the ratio of Centripetal Acceleration at {r - (2 meters)} where an astronaut's feet might be to the Centripetal Acceleration at {r} where an astronaut's head might be is given by the following fraction:

[tex](1) \ \ \ \ (Ratio.Feet.To.Head) = \left ( \frac { V_{ (r-2) }^{ 2 } } { r - 2 } \right ) / \left ( \frac {V_{ (r) }^{ 2 } } { r } \right ) \ \ = \ \ \frac { \frac { V_{ (r-2) }^{ 2 } } { r - 2 } } { \frac {V_{ (r) }^{ 2 } } { r } }[/tex]

For rotational Period "T" (that is, the time in seconds for 1 complete rotation), we have:

[tex](2) \ \ \ \ V_{ (r-2) } = \frac { 2 \pi (r - 2) } {T}[/tex]

[tex](3) \ \ \ \ V_{ (r) } = \frac { 2 \pi (r) } {T}[/tex]

so that:

[tex](4) \ \ \ \ \frac { V_{ (r-2) }^{ 2 } } { r - 2 } = \frac { 4 \pi^{2} (r - 2) } { T^{ 2 } }[/tex]

[tex](5) \ \ \ \ \frac {V_{ (r) }^{ 2 } } { r } = \frac { 4 \pi^{2} (r) } { T^{ 2 } }[/tex]

Placing Eqs #4 & #5 into Eq #1 and simplifying:

[tex](6) \ \ \ \ (Ratio.Feet.To.Head) = \frac { r - 2 } { r }[/tex]

We require the above ratio to be at least 99/100, so the Minimum acceptable "r" would be given by:

[tex](7) \ \ \ \ (Ratio.Feet.To.Head) = \frac { r - 2 } { r } = \frac {99} {100}[/tex]

[tex](8) \ \ \ \ (100)(r - 2) = (99)(r)[/tex]

[tex](9) \ \ \ \ \Longrightarrow \color{red} (Minimum.Acceptable."r") = (200 \ \ meters)[/tex]


~~
 
Last edited:
I also get 200 meters

Code:
innerdiameter = 1
outerdiameter = innerdiameter + 2
Do
    velocity = Sqr(9.8 * innerdiameter)
    outeracceleration = velocity ^ 2 / outerdiameter
    innerdiameter = innerdiameter + 1
    outerdiameter = innerdiameter + 2
Loop Until outeracceleration > 9.8 * 0.99
answer = (innerdiameter + outerdiameter) / 2
 
Thank you all very much for your quick responses. Using scholzie post I got an answer of 200 but I found xanthym easier too follow.
 
Good, I also got 200m. I was trying to give you an idea of how to do it without giving you the answer :) Glad to see it worked out though.
 
So did I. Hmm...

Here's a more direct solution.

w=v/r rad/s

af=w^2*r
ah=w^2*(r-2)

ah/af=.99=(r-2)/r

af = 1.00*g =w^2*200

To be honest I'm not entirely sure why my first method worked. I think I subconsiously realized the limiting factor was r. Or maybe I was just lucky.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K