How Far and How Long Until the Sports Car Catches Up with the Truck?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dough
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around two scenarios involving relative motion: one with a truck and a sports car, and another with two runners in a race. The original poster presents a problem about the sports car accelerating to catch up with a truck moving at a constant speed, while later posts shift focus to a race between two runners with different speeds and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore equations of motion for both scenarios, attempting to set up equations for the positions of the vehicles and runners over time. There are discussions about how to handle offsets in the equations and the implications of different setups.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided equations and attempted to solve for the time it takes for one object to catch another. There is a mix of successful attempts and clarifications regarding the setup of the equations. The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their reasoning and questioning their approaches.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the initial problem setup, with one participant expressing regret over miscommunication. The discussions also highlight the potential for quadratic equations in problems involving offsets, although not all scenarios require them.

Dough
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
A truck is traveling at a constant velocity of 22m/s north. The Driver sees a traffic light turn from red to green soon enough, so he does not have to alter his speed. Meanwhile, a woman in a sports car is stopped at a red light. At the moment the light turns green and the truck passes her, she begins to accelerate at 4.8[m/s]/s (metres per second squared). How far have both vehicles traveled when the sports car catches up with the truck? How long did it take for the sports car to catch up with the truck?

Thanks
-Dough
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dough said:
A truck is traveling at a constant velocity of 22m/s north. The Driver sees a traffic light turn from red to green soon enough, so he does not have to alter his speed. Meanwhile, a woman in a sports car is stopped at a red light. At the moment the light turns green and the truck passes her, she begins to accelerate at 4.8[m/s]/s (metres per second squared). How far have both vehicles traveled when the sports car catches up with the truck? How long did it take for the sports car to catch up with the truck?

Thanks
-Dough

Ok so you want to find an equation for both of their positions at any given time. The trucks equation will be x(t)= 22t
the sports cars equation will be x(t)=.5at^2 which = 2.4t^2
Set the equations equal to each other so that its 22t=2.4t^2 and you find the 0's
One will be 0 but the other one will be the answer which is t=9.17 seconds which is more accurately defined as 55/6.
It will take 55/6 seconds to catch up. Plug 55/6 into either equation to find out how far both vehicles have traveled which is 201.67 meters or more exactly, 605/3
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Saima Islam
now i feel really stupid cuase i typed out the wrong question :rolleyes:

ok that was easier than how the book explained it

the question that iw as supposed to type up is:

In a long distance race, Michael is running at 3.8 m/s and 75m behind Robert, who is running at a constant velocity of 4.2 m/s. If Michael accelerates at 0.15 m/s^2, how logn will it take him to catch Robert?

Damn i feel stupid for typing the wrong quesiton... what a first post...
 
Lol ok well then, let's see now. Basically you set up 2 equations again
Michael: x(t)= -75 + 3.8t + 0.075t^2
Robert: x(t)= 4.2t

Find out the zeros obviously greater then 0.

The answer comes out to be 34.4s. This is verifyable by plugging it into both equations and the distance they meet at if the origin is 0 at Robert's starting point is about 144.5 meters
 
Pengwuino said:
Lol ok well then, let's see now. Basically you set up 2 equations again
Michael: x(t)= -75 + 3.8t + 0.075t^2
Robert: x(t)= 4.2t

Find out the zeros obviously greater then 0.

The answer comes out to be 34.4s. This is verifyable by plugging it into both equations and the distance they meet at if the origin is 0 at Robert's starting point is about 144.5 meters

im going to give that a shot in a few minutes

Why isn't it

Michael: x(t)= 3.8t + 0.075t^2
Robert: x(t)= 75+ 4.2t
 
It doesn't matter. When you put the 2 equations equal to each other, that 75 can be positive for robert or, as i put it, negative for michael.
 
Great! I got it, Thanks a lot Pengwuino(cool name too)

Ok before i was doing it like this

4.2m/s × t = -75m + 3.8m/s × t + 0.075t^2
because of this i kept trying to do something stupid... like

4.2m/s = -75m + 3.8m/s × t + (0.075t^2) / t
and then cancel out the power to the 2 but then units wouldn't really allow for me to do much...

Would all questions with an offset liekt his oen be quadratic? I did a lot of other questions and none required use of the quadratic formula...
 
Only if there's a t^2 in it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K