Solving Complex If/Then Statements

  • Thread starter Thread starter qwpoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving complex logical if/then statements using specific rules of inference and replacement. The user presents three statements: 1. B v (S*N), 2. B > ~S, and 3. S > ~N, and seeks assistance in deriving conclusions from them. The solution involves applying logical rules, resulting in the conclusion B v W. Key techniques used include conjunction, distribution, simplification, and conditional derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logical operators such as conjunction ( * ) and disjunction ( v )
  • Familiarity with rules of inference and replacement in propositional logic
  • Knowledge of conditional statements and their implications
  • Ability to manipulate logical expressions and derive conclusions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the rules of inference in propositional logic, including Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens
  • Learn about logical equivalences and how to apply them in proofs
  • Explore advanced topics in propositional logic, such as quantifiers and predicate logic
  • Practice solving logical proofs using various logical operators and rules
USEFUL FOR

Students of logic, mathematicians, and anyone interested in improving their skills in logical reasoning and proof construction.

qwpoi
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
This is driving me nuts. I'm sure the answer is completely obvious.

I'm using > for the if A then B b/c there's no keyboard symbol for that, and * for the and operator because same reason.

1. B v (S*N)
2. B > ~S
3. S > ~ N / B v W

I have no idea what to do with these if/then statements, how to separate them, or anything, because I can't get any of the premises by themselves from the first statement.

Please help? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have no idea what your question is. Are these three statements the hypotheses and you want to decide what you can prove from them? Are they steps in a proof any you want to decide what you conclude? Is the last step the conclusion and you want to know if the argument is valid? What is it you want to know?
 
Sorry, should have explained more. It's a logical proof, and we have so far learned the a bunch of rules of inference and replacement. I had an epiphany in class though that I was forgetting one rule, and so was able to do it.

solution:
1. B v (S*N)
2. B > ~S
3. S > ~ N / B v W
4. (B>~S) * (S>~N) 2, 3 Conj
5. (BvS)*(BvN) 1 dist
6. BvS 5, simp
7. ~Sv~N 4, 6 CD
8. ~(S*N) DM 7
9. (S*N)vB 1 comm
10. B 8, 9 DS
11. BvW add 10
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K