Solving for Translational Speed of a Bowling Ball on a Vertical Rise

  • Thread starter Thread starter kpangrace
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the translational speed of a bowling ball as it moves up a vertical rise of 0.76 m, given its speed at the bottom of the rise. The context is rooted in energy conservation principles, specifically relating kinetic and potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of energy, noting the relationship between kinetic and potential energy at different heights. There are attempts to set up equations based on energy conservation, and questions arise about the correctness of the equations used and the calculations performed.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on the setup of energy equations and addressing specific calculation issues. There is an exploration of the implications of mass in the energy equations, and some participants are questioning their own calculations and the steps taken.

Contextual Notes

Participants express urgency due to an approaching deadline, indicating a time constraint that may affect the depth of their exploration. There is also a mention of ignoring frictional losses, which is a key assumption in the problem setup.

kpangrace
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Help! Only Have Until 11:30

A bowling ball encounters a 0.76 m vertical rise on the way back to the ball rack, as the drawing illustrates. Ignore frictional losses and assume that the mass of the ball is distributed uniformly. If the translational speed of the ball is 4.10 m/s at the bottom of the rise, find the translational speed at the top



aahh! finals are next week and i don't know what I'm doing
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a certain amount of kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp and no potential energy (using the bottom of the ramp as your base).

At the top of the ramp, you have both kinetic and potential energy, since you gained some height. Your total energy (kinetic plus potential) has to stay constant.

In other words, the kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp is equal to the sum of the kinetic energy and potential energy at the top of the ramp.

And no, the mass won't matter. If you take your equation for kinetic energy and potential energy, you'll notice you can pull the mass outside your parenthesis via the distributive property. The mass will cancel out since it's outside the parenthesis on both sides of the equation.
 
ok i put (1/2)v^2= 1/2 v^2 + gh now is that right? i plug everything in and get .957... which doesn't show up right... you know what I'm doing wrong? thanks in advance
 
Yeah, you stopped too soon.

You solved [tex]1/2 v_i^2-gh[/tex]
The other side of your equation still has [tex]1/2 v_f^2[/tex]

You need to multiply your answer by 2 to get rid of the 1/2.
Then you need to take the square root to get rid of power of 2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
20K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
15K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
17K