How Does a 90-Degree Rotation Affect the Tangential Speed of a Rod's Free End?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a thin uniform rod that is initially vertical and allowed to fall, with the goal of determining the tangential speed of its free end after a 90-degree rotation. The context is rooted in rotational dynamics and energy conservation principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss using conservation of energy to relate gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. There are attempts to express the energies involved and how they change as the rod rotates. Questions arise about the role of the angle theta in the energy equations and the relationship between angular velocity and tangential speed.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the energy conservation approach and the implications of torque and forces acting on the rod. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding the motion of the center of mass and the nature of the pivot. Some participants suggest different ways to model the motion, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the frictionless nature of the pivot and the implications for the motion of the rod. Participants are also considering the effects of gravitational forces and how they influence the dynamics of the system.

futron
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me on the following problem? I'm not sure how to relate the 90-degree rotation with the rest of what's being asked.

A thin uniform rod is initially positioned in the vertical direction, with its lower end attached to a frictionless axis that is mounted on the floor. The rod has a length of 1.20 m and is allowed to fall, starting from rest. Find the tangential speed of the free end of the rod, just before the rod hits the floor after rotating through 90°.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider the rod after it has fallen through an angle theta. Use conservation of energy. You have the gravitational potantial energy, rotational kinetic energy and the translational kinetic energy to consider when writing conservation of energy equation. Using this you will be able to find the angular velocity at angle theta. Substitute theta = 90 to find the angular speed at 90 degrees. Use Tangantial speed = length * angular speed to find your required answer.
 
I've E=(1/2)mv^2+(1/2)Iw^2+mgh, but I'm still unclear as to how theta fits into this equation.
 
Let's assume that the gravitational potantial energy is zero at the bottom level of the rod.

Initial Energy = mg L/2 ( L, the length of the rod)


Final energy = [tex]mg L/2 * cos \theta + 1/2 m (L/2*w)^2 + 1/2 I w^2[/tex]


The second term in the right is same as your 1/2 m v^2

But,

[tex]1/2 m v^2 = 1/2 m ( v_{radial} ^2 + v_{tangantial}^2)[/tex]

But if you look at the motion of the rod, radial velocity = 0.

therefore, [tex]1/2 m v^2 = 1/2 m v_{tangantial}^2)[/tex]
 
futron said:
A thin uniform rod is initially positioned in the vertical direction, with its lower end attached to a frictionless axis that is mounted on the floor. The rod has a length of 1.20 m and is allowed to fall, starting from rest. Find the tangential speed of the free end of the rod, just before the rod hits the floor after rotating through 90°.
Since the bottom is frictionless, there is no horizontal component of force on the rod. There is only gravity and a vertical normal force. That normal force produces the torque on the rod that causes it to rotate. It also reduces the downward acceleration. The centre of mass of the rod just falls straight down.

The rotational motion is given by the torque of the centre of mass about the end on the table:

[tex]\tau = mgcos\theta L/2 = I\alpha[/tex]

where [itex]\theta[/itex] is the angle made by the rod to the horizontal surface.

The change in potential energy of the rod during the fall is mgL/2. This is equal to the work done by the torque, which is converted entirely to rotational energy:

[tex]mgL/2 = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2[/tex]

Just work out the angular speed [itex]\omega[/itex] and the tangential speed from that. (You have to use the moment of inertia of a thin rod about its end).

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
Since the bottom is frictionless, there is no horizontal component of force on the rod. There is only gravity and a vertical normal force. That normal force produces the torque on the rod that causes it to rotate. It also reduces the downward acceleration. The centre of mass of the rod just falls straight down.
I believe the pivot is mounted on the floor and does not move. The rod merely pivots about the fixed axis; the center of mass does not fall straight down.

Nonetheless, your solution is correct. :smile: (If the pivot were actually freely moving, then the rod could not be modeled as being in pure rotation about the pivot. :wink: )
 
Doc Al said:
I believe the pivot is mounted on the floor and does not move. The rod merely pivots about the fixed axis; the center of mass does not fall straight down.
If the centre of mass does not fall straight down, what force moves the centre of mass horizontally?

If the pivot were actually freely moving, then the rod could not be modeled as being in pure rotation about the pivot.
The pivot is freely moving horizontally. I don't see why the rod cannot be modeled as pure rotation (about the end that is on the surface) in the inertial frame of the floor.

It can also be modeled as a combination of rotation about the centre of mass (torque provided by the normal force) + the acceleration of the centre of mass. But the latter is more complicated to do:

[tex]mg - mgsin\theta = ma[/tex] and:

[tex]mgsin\theta cos\theta L/2 = I\alpha = \frac{1}{12}mL^2\alpha[/tex]

You then work out the rotational speed of the rod about its centre of mass to find the tangential speed of the end relative to the centre of mass. You then add the speed of the centre of mass to get the speed of the end relative to the floor - not a trivial problem to solve.

AM

EDIT: Sorry, I see that I misread the problem. I interpreted it as a frictionless surface. In re-reading, I see that end on the floor is fixed to the floor, so there is horizontal force. You can use the above for the case where the end is not horizontally fixed. The solution is the same, however, because the horizontal force does no work.

AM
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K