Understanding Pendulum Work and Energy: A Scientist's Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter coile3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pendulum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a pendulum and a cart, focusing on the concepts of mechanical energy, potential energy, and kinetic energy during the pendulum's motion and its interaction with the cart. Participants explore the energy transformations that occur as the pendulum swings and strikes the cart, which then moves up a ramp.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the initial mechanical energy of the pendulum and the energy converted during its motion. They express uncertainty about their reasoning and seek clarification on energy conservation principles.
  • Some participants question the assumptions regarding energy conservation and the effects of friction on the ramp, while others discuss the implications of a perfectly elastic collision.
  • There are inquiries about the cart's motion if no mechanical energy is lost, leading to discussions about the role of gravity and the potential for the cart to rise indefinitely.

Discussion Status

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of numerical values in the original post, indicating a focus on conceptual understanding rather than specific calculations. The discussion also touches on the assumption of no energy loss and the ideal conditions of the system.

coile3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am having dificulty with a problem involving a pendulum. Basically the pendulum is at rest at a specified height. The pendulum is then allowed to swing and it strikes a cart at the base of it's arc and then the cart rolls up a ramp while the pendulum swings back to a lesser height than originally. I need the initial mechanical energy for the system, which I think should be the potential energy of the pendulum (grav*mass*height). I also need the amount of energy converted from mechanical to non-mechanical during the motion, which I think I can find by finding the new potential energy (grav*mass*height2) and subtracting this from the initial potentioal energy. Lastly, I need to know how far the cart will travel if no energy is converted. I didn't post numerical values because I would like help in understanding what is happening and I would like to lknow if any of my thoughts are wrong.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the point of the contact,assuming you've chosen it to be the "0" of the gravit.pot.energy,the bob of the pendulum has only KE (and momentum,of course) which he transfers to the body (cart) it hits,making it go up the ramp (assuming no friction on the ramp).It's really nice to assume a perfect elastic collision.

I didn''t get the converting part.Basically,if yo make that assumption,total mechanical energy (KE + grav.potential) is conserved in every interaction.

Daniel.
 
Yep just make sure to conserve energy and momentum at each step. Problems like this often show up on the physics GRE.
 
What would then happen to the cart. I know it get sent on it's way up the ramp but how does this motion change if there is no loss to the mechanical energy in the system.

dextercioby: The conversion is the amount of energy changed from mechanical to some other form (ie. heat).
 
Heat,means,in the case of the cart,friction on the ramp.Again,u must/are invited to use the theorem of variation of KE:

[tex]\Delta KE=\mbox{Total work}[/tex]

,where "Total work" stands for the total work done by the forces acting on the cart:gravity & friction.

Daniel.
 
I am still having trouble with the last part of the problem. In the event that there is no mechanical energy lost (100% conserved) how high up the ramp will the cart rise? I can't seem to figure out how to go about this part of the problem. We are only looking at work/energy in the problem. Is it possible that the cart will rise forever because there is no mechanical energy being converted to slow it down (Newton's object in motion will stay in motion until acted upon.

Thanks for the quick responses earlier.
 
Nope,gravity (the tangential component) is pulling it down,making it eventually to stop and then fall down again.

Use the theorem.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K