Abstract algebra problem concern

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves group theory, specifically the concept of orbits in the context of a group of permutations. The original poster is exploring the relationship between orbits of elements in a set under a group action.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to articulate their understanding of the orbit concept and questions potential subtleties in their reasoning. Some participants suggest ensuring detailed algebraic steps to avoid oversight. Others share their rough definitions of the group and explore implications of group properties on orbits.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with some expressing confidence in their understanding while others seek clarification on specific points. Guidance has been offered regarding the structure of the argument, indicating a productive direction for refining the original poster's approach.

Contextual Notes

There are concerns about the completeness of definitions and the implications of group properties, such as closure and the nature of elements within the group. The original poster acknowledges the need for further refinement of their argument.

vsage
My prof. assigned this problem as the only one for HW a few days back, and for some reason the answer seems too obvious. What subtleties could I possibly be missing?

Let G be a group of permutations in a set S. If [tex]x, y \in S[/tex] and [tex]y \in orb_g(x)[/tex], then [tex]orb_g(y) = orb_g(x)[/tex]

Still, I am unsure how to put it in words. I'll edit this post as I come up with ideas but I think I might need a kick in the right direction, because even as I'm writing this I'm starting to realize it's not entirely trivial.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's obvious too. :smile:

I would just make sure I did the algebra in painstaking detail, so that I wasn't worried about any of the steps.
 
It's good to hear I wasn't overthinking it then! Here is my rough answer that I'll fine-tune later but I'd like to hear opinions on it.

I define G as follows: [tex]G = \{\phi_e, \phi_1, \phi^{-1}_1, \phi_2, \phi^{-1}_2, ...\}[/tex]

If [tex]y \in orb_G(x)[/tex], then [tex]\phi(x) = y[/tex] for some [tex]\phi \in G[/tex]. Obviously since G is a group, [tex]\phi^{-1} \in G, \phi^{-1}(y) = x[/tex]. That being said, am I on the right track at least? I know it's not complete, but it shouldn't be hard to wrap up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok now I'm stumped. I proved that [tex]x \in orb_G(y)[/tex] by [tex]y \in orb_G(x)[/tex] but I can't seem to tie an arbitrary element of [tex]orb_g(x)[/tex] to [tex]orb_g(y)[/tex], ie I can't determine [tex]\phi_i(x) = x_i = \phi_j(y)[/tex]. Any guidance?

Edit: I think I got the missing key. Since G is a group, any arbitrary [tex]\phi_i, \phi_j \in G[/tex], [tex]\phi_i\phi_j[/tex] must also lie in G. So for an arbitary [tex]x_i \in orb_G(x) | \phi_i(x) = x_i[/tex], if [tex]\phi(x) = y, \phi \in G[/tex] then [tex]\phi_i(\phi^{-1}(y)) = x_i[/tex] and by the closed nature of G, [tex]\phi_i(\phi^{-1}(y)) \in G[/tex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stylistic note: there's no reason to write an enumeration of the elements of G. Furthermore, it is misleading, or even wrong! For example, the group might not be countable, or maybe [itex]\phi_1 = \phi_1^{-1}[/itex]!

Your edit makes me think you have the right idea... now clean it up! Make it look like:

Let [itex]z \in \mathrm{Orb}_G(x)[/itex]
...
Therefore [itex]z \in \mathrm{Orb}_G(y)[/itex]

And vice versa. (Or, do the whole thing with if and only if deductions, so you don't have to do the vice versa)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K