How Do CLC Circuits Oscillate in Series and Parallel Configurations?

  • Context: Archived 
  • Thread starter Thread starter freemind
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the oscillation behavior of a circuit comprising two capacitors and an inductor, analyzing both series and parallel configurations. In a parallel connection, the total capacitance is the sum of the individual capacitors, leading to synchronized charge redistribution without oscillation between the capacitors. Conversely, in a series connection, the effective capacitance is calculated using the formula C = C1*C2/(C1 + C2), resulting in oscillations where the voltages across the capacitors vary, centered around an offset voltage derived from their initial charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of LC circuits and their oscillation principles
  • Knowledge of capacitor and inductor behavior in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with series and parallel circuit configurations
  • Basic grasp of voltage, charge, and current relationships in circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the series-capacitance formula: C = C1*C2/(C1 + C2)
  • Explore the dynamics of LC oscillators and their applications in electronics
  • Investigate the effects of initial charge conditions on oscillation parameters
  • Learn about phase differences in oscillating circuits and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and hobbyists interested in circuit design and analysis, particularly those focusing on oscillatory behavior in LC circuits.

freemind
Hello folks,

Consider an ideal circuit with a capacitor, inductor, and another capacitor, in that order (the inductor is in between). Let's start off with the initial condition being that there is a charge [tex]q_0[/tex] on capacitor 1. Here's what I'm wondering: would this circuit behave like a regual LC circuit, in that as one capacitor discharges, the other capacitor will charge up (and this cycle will reverse repeatedly)? Or am I missing something important here?

Thanks

P.S: the point of this is to find the oscillation parameters of the circuit, but I'm not asking for that answer. :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem statement doesn't indicate whether the components are connected in series or in parallel. We can consider both situations.

We assume that potentials are referenced from a common point, at the bottom of the circuit.

upload_2016-2-5_21-48-32.png


Parallel connection:
The capacitors will immediately redistribute the charge across both capacitors the instant the switch closes (we're assuming ideal components and wiring). The peak voltage of the ensuing oscillations will be lowered accordingly. The circuit will behave as a typical LC oscillator where the "C" in this case is the sum of the two capacitors: C = C1 + C2. The voltage across them will be the same at all times after the circuit is connected. So the charge won't ping-pong back and forth between the capacitors. Instead they gain and lose their charge in sync, trading potential for current with the inductor.

Series connection:
In this case the net capacitance is given by the series-capacitance formula: C = C1*C2/(C1 + C2). The capacitors can have different voltages over time, and charge will move from one to the other, driven by the oscillations of the current. Note that the potentials on the capacitors will oscillate about an offset voltage, not zero volts. This is due to the capacitors starting out with unequal charges hence unequal voltages, and the current always moving the same amount of charge for each. The offset would be equal to the voltage that would be obtained if the capacitors were simply connected in parallel. If both capacitors are of equal value the offset is half the initial voltage of the one initially charged. So for example if that voltage was 100 V, both capacitors would oscillate between 0 and 100 V potential difference with the common reference point, with their sinewaves centered on 50 V. Due to the phase difference you would see a 200 V sinewave across the inductor.
 

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
152
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K