Get Expert Physics Help for Collisions - Step-by-Step Guide

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to collisions, specifically focusing on the application of conservation laws in momentum and energy. Participants are seeking clarification on how to approach the problem and interpret the given formulas.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to apply conservation of momentum in both x and y directions. There are questions about the validity and interpretation of the provided formulas, particularly regarding the relationship between angles and velocities.

Discussion Status

Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of conservation principles. Multiple interpretations of the formulas are being explored, with participants expressing confusion and questioning the assumptions behind the setup.

Contextual Notes

There appears to be some ambiguity in the provided formulas, particularly concerning the dependence of one angle on another, which is causing participants to question the problem's formulation.

naren11
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

http://img219.exs.cx/img219/9273/lastscan19rc.jpg

Can anybody explain how to startup the questions? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
naren11 said:
Hello,

http://img219.exs.cx/img219/9273/lastscan19rc.jpg

Can anybody explain how to startup the questions? Thank you!

For the first question : use conservation of linear momentum and conservation of energy. That's all you'll need to do.

marlon
 
Be sure that you apply momentum-conservation in both the x and y direction of the frame of reference.

marlon
 
The formula they gave looks weird...That [itex]\vartheta_{2}[/itex] is written as a function of [itex]\vartheta_{1}[/itex] & [itex]\cos\vartheta_{2}[/itex] :bugeye:

Since the problem reminds somehow of the classical HS theory of Compton effect,i assume that [itex]\vartheta_{2}[/itex] can be found exactly...

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
The formula they gave looks weird...That [itex]\vartheta_{2}[/itex] is written as a function of [itex]\vartheta_{1}[/itex] & [itex]\cos\vartheta_{2}[/itex] :bugeye:

Since the problem reminds somehow of the classical HS theory of Compton effect,i assume that [itex]\vartheta_{2}[/itex] can be found exactly...

Daniel.

I AGREE (hey that feels strange :smile: ). The formula i get has a v1' and a cosine of theta_1, instead of v1 * cos(theta2). It seems quite stupid to me that we'd set up a formula for theta 2 that actually contains the theta2

marlon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K