Is a 2.3 BAC Possible? - Jacob's Inquiry

  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the plausibility of a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 2.3, with participants sharing personal anecdotes and interpretations of BAC measurements. The scope includes conceptual understanding of BAC and its implications for health, particularly in extreme cases of alcohol consumption.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jacob expresses skepticism about the claim of a 2.3 BAC, suggesting that it is likely a misunderstanding of the decimal point, and that such a high BAC would be fatal.
  • One participant humorously misunderstands BAC, thinking anything above 1.0 would imply over 100% alcohol content.
  • Another participant clarifies that BAC is a percentage of alcohol in the blood, indicating that a .3 BAC corresponds to 3 parts per thousand.
  • A participant agrees with Jacob's estimate, asserting that a 2.3% BAC would imply a level of alcohol higher than that found in some beers, which seems implausible.
  • Another participant provides a definition of Blood Alcohol Level (BAL), explaining how it is measured in milligrams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a BAC of 2.3 is highly improbable, with multiple views on the interpretation of BAC measurements and the implications of extreme alcohol consumption. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of the claims made by the teenagers mentioned.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the understanding of BAC measurements among participants, with some confusion about the decimal representation and its implications for health outcomes.

wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
I was hanging out with some friends tonight, and they started talking about people who had gone to the hospital because of drinking. Unless my health teacher lied to me horribly, .3 is generally where adults start dying. A friend of mine once had .3 at age 14, and had to go to the hospital and get his stomach pumped - that was really really really bad.

But a kid there claimed that at least 2 other kids had gotten 2.3's. According to the former kid, one of the latter kids had drunk a poland spring bottle full of vodka, and thus got a 2.3 BAC, and had to have his stomach pumped several times. I'm PRETTY sure that these guys just have the decimal in the wrong place, and these teenage kids had a .23 BAC, and needed their stomach pumped, as having 2 percent of your blood being alcohol simply sounds like it couldn't happen with you surviving.

Anyone learned in the science of crunkology that can clarify this pressing issue?

Thanks,
Jacob
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Hell i thought anything above 1.0 meant over 100% lol, so i don't know :)
 
I thought BAC was literally percentage of alcohol in the blood, so a .3 BAC meant that you had 3 parts per thousand of alcohol in your blood.
 
I think your estimate is right. Those kids had the decimal in the wrong place, or perhaps they were just lying. If they had 2.3% blood/alcohol level then their blood would be more alcoholic than some cheap American beers. That's just not going to work.

Huck
 
It is... but I am not sure what the number means. let me check it out...

Ok here we go

The amount of alcohol in your blood stream is referred to as Blood Alcohol Level (BAL). It is recorded in milligrams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood, or milligrams percent. For example, a BAL of .10 means that 1/10 of 1 percent (or 1/1000) of your total blood content is alcohol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K