Collision (kinetic energy lost)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two pendulums with different masses and their behavior during a collision. The original poster seeks assistance with understanding the kinetic energy lost during the collision, following the initial calculations of speed and angles after the impact.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of initial and final kinetic energy, questioning the correct interpretation of energy loss. There is also exploration of the implications of assuming an inelastic collision and how that affects the calculations of velocities after the collision.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying concepts related to kinetic energy and momentum. Some have pointed out potential assumptions that need to be made regarding the nature of the collision, while others are questioning the completeness of the original problem statement.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of explicit information regarding whether the collision is elastic or inelastic, which affects the calculations and assumptions made by participants. The original poster has derived certain variables but is uncertain about how to proceed with the energy loss calculation.

FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
Ok, I'm really lost here. I guess I do not understand the equations well enough to think on my own in this question :)

So the question is as follows:
Two simple pendulums of equal length are suspended from the same point. The pendulum bobs are point like masses. m1 > m2. The more massive bob (m1) is initially drawn back at an angle of 40^(degrees) from vertical. After m1 is released what is:

1. Find the speed of m1 just before the collision.
2. Determine the maximum angle to which the masses swing after the collision.
3. How much energy is lost during the collision?

Ok, I understand how to do 1 and 2. But I have no idea what to do with question 3.
To make things easier let's assume the folllowing variables have been derived or are known:
m1
m2
v_1i : initial velocity of pendulum swinging towards the stationary bob
v_1f : the velocity of the larger bob after the collision
v_2i : = 0... since the lower-mass-bob is not moving
v_2f : the velocity of the smaller bob after the collision

Any suggestion on how to handle the loss in kinetic energy would be fantastic... thank you.


EDIT: Ok thinking about this... I think I might understand the question now.

Initial Kinetic Energy:
[tex] KE_i = \frac{1}{2}m_1(v_{1i})^2 + \frac{1}{2}m_2(0)^2[/tex]

[tex] KE_f = \frac{1}{2}(v_{1f})^2 + \frac{1}{2}m_2(v_{2f})^2[/tex]

So the loss of kinetic is [tex]KE_f - KE_i[/tex] ...? right? :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
FrogPad said:
So the loss of kinetic is [tex]KE_f - KE_i[/tex] ...? right? :)
That will be the change in KE, which is negative in this case. The loss of KE would be [tex]KE_i - KE_f[/tex]. But you've got the idea.
 
Interesting. "Probasket" (any relation?) asked basically the same question except added that this a completely inelastic collision- that the to pendulum bobs move as one after the collision. Without that, there is no reason to think that any energy is lost!
 
FrogPad,

How did you calculate v1f and v2f without knowing how much KE is lost? Aren't there an inifinite number of combinations of values for v1f and v2f that conserve momentum?
 
Right. FrogPad seems to have left out some key information in the statement of the problem (like the two masses stuck together after impact) that allowed him to solve parts 1 and 2.
 
Ahh yes, sorry about that. The question does not explicitly say that it is an inelastic collision, instead you have to make this assumption based off of:

2. Determine the maximum angle to which the masses swing after the collision.


Which I guess infers that the maximum angle of both objects "stuck together". I guess if it said: "determine the maximum angle's' then it would be an elastic collision.

Seriously though, thank you very much for the comments.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K